Armillary sphere
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
-dps, 2025
Beliefs are based on circular logic turning into a conflict of reason (belief vs disbelief)...both sides tempt one to ignore being (life) within align aka a line (inception towards death).
Notice furthermore that "my" implies taking possession...doing that within a line distorts procession.
Everything you've just said is circular logic. Your ideas kill their own selves. Have some self r3fl3cti0n, bro.
Wrong. WRONG. You had "it" already.
The only thing distorting anything here is your word games distorting YOUR "procession".
a) Everything was perceivable before one can suggest what it is. In this case...sound was before one can logistically think about words shaped within.
b) Logic (circular thinking) is based on ones consent to suggested logos (words shaped within sound).
a) Others suggest ideal-ism which tempts one to consent to idolatry...doing that implies self destruction, not being killed by others.
b) The suggested words "me; myself or I" tempt one to claim self possession, while ignoring that potential (life) during procession (inception towards death) cannot be held onto.
One cannot own anything...it requires mass ignorance thereof to permit few to "own" everything many are ignoring.
c) Intercourse for off-spring implies "self" being perpetuated through one another.
Re (to respond) flect (to bend) ion (action)...action (inception towards death) bends reactions (life) by separating each one from one another.
Few trick many to self reflect by "remembrance" aka by recollecting suggested information held within memory, which is how circular logic contains the one thinking within his "own" mind/memory.
Perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, only drawn from on the fly. Memory is necessary for adaptation, while tempting storage aka owning aka taking into possession, while one needs to resist to be able to adapt.
Wrong/wer - "to turn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/wrong hence turning into a conflict of reason (wrong vs right).
a) Generation implies motion (male) through momentum (female) into matter (transformed offspring)...suggested "it" tempts one to ignore the implied division of gender aka s(plit)he + wo(mb)man + fe(minine)male.
b) YOU is based upon one taking possession over self as I, while ignoring one aka each naturally designated unit/unitas/unus - "one".
There can be only one.
Thing implies a division of everything (whole) into each thing (partial) aka oneness dividing into ones, hence "one and only".
Game/gamble implies taking CHANCE, while giving up CHOICE. Why would free-will-of-choice play such a game?
Free-will-of-choice describes the implication of sound by separating words to make it harder for others to bind themselves by holding onto them.
Procession (inception towards death) was before potential (life) comes into being...potential reasoning (me vs you) against one another implies a dis (to divide) tort (to twist) ion (action).
Sleight of hand for distortion (twist) and reason (shout)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VhlSmPNsDA
Notice that Ferris/ferry/fare (to carry; pass over) doesn't utter words...he just pretends to, while remaining within the sound of silence.
You believe that you are correct. "Reasoning conflicts are circular" IMPLIES THAT YOU ARE ALREADY THINKING IN CIRCLES.
To obscure, obfuscate, and ARTIFICIALLY prop up their superflous word analysises. Instead of rebut and defend, you choose to tinker with words like a child first knowing abt language.
And then you believe things to be true that make it so that you never face the fact that your beliefs are not correct. That they are a scam.
Yes, a scam.
Your worldview is not based on "intellectual growth", but based on stupidity and constant denial.
Freewill of choice: "My word analyses are true because they are true. I can't give you anything though, only use circular reasoning. I criticize you for being circular all while i myself am circular."