You can't GPT things that nobody ever wrote about. That way things become even more interesting. It's easy now to separate original thinkers from those without own thoughts.
I wouldn't dismiss meme completely too, but it could be inteesting to estimate a probablility of twin for living people.
Human genetics is in strange state today. From one point it is studied intensely and financed a lot, but from the other side, it is under heavy pressure to not even try to discuss and study things that could be accounted as "intolerant". Looks like studying connection of the human appearance with actual DNA code fall into "intolerant" area.
people have written plenty, there are published, peer reviewed sicence that shows virus theory to be unproven and even court cases where it was clear that Measels is not contagious or harmful. gpt avoids even mentioning Dr. Stefan Lanza, and when you ask point blank, GPT usually injects some propaganda you already know,, to solidify your programming to believe "the vast majority of scientists and doctors" which is appeal to authority logical fallacy.
im sure there was plenty of writing that disprove DNA. but that wont get mentioned. probably writing about cloning, blocked. All of chemistry is build on shading foundations. atom theory, it drives DNA theory and its full of holes.
You can't GPT things that nobody ever wrote about. That way things become even more interesting. It's easy now to separate original thinkers from those without own thoughts.
I wouldn't dismiss meme completely too, but it could be inteesting to estimate a probablility of twin for living people.
Human genetics is in strange state today. From one point it is studied intensely and financed a lot, but from the other side, it is under heavy pressure to not even try to discuss and study things that could be accounted as "intolerant". Looks like studying connection of the human appearance with actual DNA code fall into "intolerant" area.
people have written plenty, there are published, peer reviewed sicence that shows virus theory to be unproven and even court cases where it was clear that Measels is not contagious or harmful. gpt avoids even mentioning Dr. Stefan Lanza, and when you ask point blank, GPT usually injects some propaganda you already know,, to solidify your programming to believe "the vast majority of scientists and doctors" which is appeal to authority logical fallacy.
im sure there was plenty of writing that disprove DNA. but that wont get mentioned. probably writing about cloning, blocked. All of chemistry is build on shading foundations. atom theory, it drives DNA theory and its full of holes.