a) Card implies essence, hence ordinal (inception towards death) generating cardinal (life) aka each one card within all natural order.
b) Deck implies a cover, an ornament; an arrangement etc. Nature doesn't cover...ordinal (all perceivable) reveals cardinal (ones perception). That's why one can't use someone else's deck (suggestion) without corrupting ones card (perception).
c) Tarot/taraha - "he rejected, put aside" implies one who rejects the decks of others, hence putting aside (suggestion), while remaining center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable).
d) Sacred (holy/whole) + rule/reg (to move in a straight line) implies each partial (life) being moved in a straight line (inception towards death) within whole.
e) Fortune implies "chance", the inversion of "choice"...ones free will of choice implies the card; while the tales of fortunes suggested by others implies the deck. The choice is yours...tarot or torat/torah.
Temptation draws forwards...free will of choice adapts to perceivable origin, while resisting the temptation of suggested outcomes.
to add legitimacy
Only natural legit/legis/lex (law) can add (inception) and subtract (death)...the beings living within utilize macy (magic) to distract each other from that.
your subversive presence
"Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person."...is it me who continues to subvert the rules?
An arguing mind cannot be free...it binds itself to a conflict.
I made an argument.
You made your mind arguing.
I have accused you
Which implies cursing self by cussing at another. As choice one needs to adapt to cause...not accuse others, while cursing self by steering off course.
Why aren't you adhering...
a) ...because adhesive would put free will of choice into a sticky situation.
b) How could one attack a person if one didn't attack (or defend) any argument? What did I do to your arguing mind? Have I ever even downvoted you?
𝕲𝖗𝖎𝖋𝖙 𝕮𝖆𝖗𝖉𝖘.
a) Card implies essence, hence ordinal (inception towards death) generating cardinal (life) aka each one card within all natural order.
b) Deck implies a cover, an ornament; an arrangement etc. Nature doesn't cover...ordinal (all perceivable) reveals cardinal (ones perception). That's why one can't use someone else's deck (suggestion) without corrupting ones card (perception).
c) Tarot/taraha - "he rejected, put aside" implies one who rejects the decks of others, hence putting aside (suggestion), while remaining center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable).
d) Sacred (holy/whole) + rule/reg (to move in a straight line) implies each partial (life) being moved in a straight line (inception towards death) within whole.
e) Fortune implies "chance", the inversion of "choice"...ones free will of choice implies the card; while the tales of fortunes suggested by others implies the deck. The choice is yours...tarot or torat/torah.
Are you attempting to add legitimacy to this submission by implying it's important, by your subversive presence?
Temptation draws forwards...free will of choice adapts to perceivable origin, while resisting the temptation of suggested outcomes.
Only natural legit/legis/lex (law) can add (inception) and subtract (death)...the beings living within utilize macy (magic) to distract each other from that.
"Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person."...is it me who continues to subvert the rules?
You made no argument.
I made an argument.
I have accused you of platform abuse.
Why aren't you adhering to Rule #1?*
An arguing mind cannot be free...it binds itself to a conflict.
You made your mind arguing.
Which implies cursing self by cussing at another. As choice one needs to adapt to cause...not accuse others, while cursing self by steering off course.
a) ...because adhesive would put free will of choice into a sticky situation.
b) How could one attack a person if one didn't attack (or defend) any argument? What did I do to your arguing mind? Have I ever even downvoted you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMfTDFIdRQw&t=370s
On Taco Tuesday? No way!