This is the full sized screenshot, clicking the thread title. Not too long.. 807 x 5060

https://media.scored.co/post/ANt8VdazWHYQ.jpeg

Getting into this cause somebody replied to that thread from the other week. Was checking out the few videos he said:

DOGEBullets

1 points 1 day ago Now do building 7

https://youtu.be/677i43QfYpQ

https://youtu.be/iFmgIXPmNnA

https://youtu.be/c27dpYKcZ8A

https://thenarrowgateweb.com/2016/08/13/energy-weapons-teslas-suppressed-technologies/

I saw this stuff before.. but why would BBC say building 7 collapsed meanwhile it was still up in the background.

Well, from my research about all that the other week. The stuff just turns to "dust". Was no chunks of things left in the rubble. No chunks of computers. Was like some hidden military tech. So if they wanted to get rid of the mounds of evidence.. seems like an effective way.

Now who was in building 7.

what government agencies were in building 7

Several government agencies had offices in 7 World Trade Center at the time of the 9/11 attacks:

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Occupied floors 11, 12, and 13. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Regional Council: Located on floors 24 and 25. U.S. Secret Service: Had offices on floors 9 and 10. Federal Emergency Management Agency (NYC Office of Emergency Management): Located on floor 23. Department of Defense (DOD): Shared the 25th floor with the IRS. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA): Also had an office on the 25th floor, operating behind the front of another federal organization. Conspiracy theories often focus on the presence of these agencies, particularly the CIA and SEC, as potential reasons for wanting to destroy the building and any sensitive information they might have held.

wasn't the NSA in there?

Based on the information available, the National Security Agency (NSA) was not listed as having an office in 7 World Trade Center.

The government agencies that were tenants in the building included:

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)   Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Regional Council U.S. Secret Service   Federal Emergency Management Agency (NYC Office of Emergency Management) Department of Defense (DOD)   Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) - operating behind the front of another federal organization. While the NSA is a major intelligence agency, its presence in Building 7 on 9/11 has not been officially documented in the sources I have access to. Conspiracy theories tend to focus on the CIA and SEC due to the sensitive nature of their work and the potential for holding significant information.

Then you had the guy who owned the building.

who owned building 7.. did he own the two towers too?

The original 7 World Trade Center was developed by Silverstein Properties, who managed, operated, and were responsible for leasing the office tower. The land itself was owned by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ).  

As for the Twin Towers (1 and 2 World Trade Center), the land was also owned by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. However, in July 2001, just weeks before the 9/11 attacks, the Port Authority leased the Twin Towers, along with 4 and 5 World Trade Center and some retail space, to Silverstein Properties, headed by Larry Silverstein.  

So, while Larry Silverstein's company leased the Twin Towers, he did not own the land they stood on, which was owned by the Port Authority. He did, however, develop and effectively own 7 World Trade Center through a ground lease agreement with the Port Authority.  

oh so silverstein only owned the two towers, not building 7

You're close, but there's a nuance. Larry Silverstein, through his company Silverstein Properties, held a lease on the Twin Towers (1 and 2 World Trade Center). He didn't own the land itself; that belonged to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.  

However, Silverstein developed and effectively owned the original 7 World Trade Center through a ground lease agreement with the Port Authority. So, in a way, he had a stronger ownership stake in Building 7 than in the Twin Towers, where he was primarily the leaseholder.  

To summarize:

Twin Towers (1 & 2 WTC): Leased by Silverstein Properties from the Port Authority.   Building 7 WTC (original): Developed and owned (through a ground lease) by Silverstein Properties.  

Recall seeing video of this guy talking about pulling building 7.

Search youtube for: larry silverstein pull it

"9/11-WTC7 Larry Silverstein says 'PULL IT' (INSIDE JOB)"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p34XrI2Fm6I

Transcript:

world trade center seven had always been considered the starting point for rebuilding located north of the slurry wall seven had been cleared faster than the rest of the site and there had been no bodies to recover pelted by debris when the north tower collapsed seven burned until late afternoon allowing occupants to evacuate to safety i remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me that they were not sure they're going to be able to contain the fire i said you know we've had such terrible loss of life maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse

how damaged was building 7 from the twin towers collapsing.. I don't think there was much debris going into it?

You're right to question the extent of the debris damage to Building 7. While it wasn't directly hit by either of the collapsing towers, it did sustain damage from the falling debris, particularly from the collapse of the North Tower (WTC 1).

Here's what the official investigations and available evidence indicate about the damage:

Southwest Corner Damage: The most significant impact was on the southwest corner of Building 7. Large pieces of debris from the North Tower struck this area, causing structural damage to several lower floors, estimated to range from around the 7th to the 17th floor. Some reports mention that seven exterior columns were severed in this area. South Facade Damage: There were also reports and photographic evidence of damage to the south facade of the building, including a large vertical gash visible after the collapse of the Twin Towers. This suggests debris impacts higher up as well, possibly between the 24th and 41st floors. Fires Ignited: The debris also ignited fires on multiple lower floors of Building 7, primarily on the south and west sides. These fires burned uncontrolled for several hours due to the failure of the building's sprinkler system in the lower floors (the water supply was damaged by the collapse of the Twin Towers). East, West, and North Facades: The east, west, and north facades of Building 7 appear to have sustained relatively minor damage from the initial collapses. The focus of the structural damage and the subsequent fires was on the south and southwest sides. Intact Fireproofing: Unlike the Twin Towers where the impact stripped off significant amounts of fireproofing, the fireproofing in WTC 7 is believed to have remained largely intact, except for localized areas around the debris impact on the southwest corner. So, while Building 7 wasn't pulverized by debris, it did experience significant structural damage on its south and southwest sides due to the impact from the collapsing North Tower. This damage, coupled with the ensuing uncontrolled fires, is the official explanation for the building's eventual collapse.

Conspiracy theories often downplay the extent of this initial damage to suggest that the fires alone couldn't have caused such a catastrophic and symmetrical collapse, implying that other factors (like controlled demolition) must have been involved. However, the NIST report details how the structural damage and the prolonged, intense fires led to the progressive failure of critical support columns within the building.

I look this up, eh.. to see how damaged it was after the two towers collapsing. That stuff was all dust.. so not much damage. Was on fire and this same "grey" smoke like the towers.. where it's cement and metal being turns to "dust".

Remember.. it wasn't hit by a fucking plane with a bunch of jet fuel in it, right. So.. what's gonna "burn". Office furniture.. drop down ceilings.. carpets. That shit would be "black".. not "grey". lol.

"9/11: Caught on Tape: WTC Building 7 Damaged by Falling Debris from Twin Towers (Earlier Version)" 50 seconds long

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sW5TRGcJnAk

"9/11 CONSPIRACY: THE BIZARRE COLLAPSE OF BUILDING #7" 4min 52sec

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9XNZ8nWjD8

They wonder why the sprinkler never went off. Yeah, eh?

Oh.. the water main was fucked from the towers. lol.

building 7 on 9/11.. what was going on with the sprinkler system. Was no plane that smashed into it, with a bunch of jet fuel. The twin towers didn't fall on it. So it wasn't all that damaged. Yet it kept burning all day.. as if there was zero water sprinklers, the whole time.

The sprinkler system in WTC 7 did not function on the lower floors due to damage to the city's water mains caused by the collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 2. These water mains served as both the primary and backup water supply for the sprinkler systems on the lower 20 floors of WTC 7.

Debris from the collapse of WTC 1 ignited fires on at least 10 floors of WTC 7. The fires on some of the lower floors (7-9 and 11-13) burned uncontrollably due to the lack of water supply to the sprinkler system. These uncontrolled fires spread and grew, eventually leading to the structural failure and collapse of the entire building.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conducted an extensive investigation and concluded that the collapse 1 of WTC 7 was primarily due to the uncontrolled fires that weakened the steel structure, leading to a progressive collapse.

yeah but there was no jet fuel.. plus my research, seems like a building never fell down from just normal fires. And you've seen like other skyscrapers on fire, real bad..

You're right to point out that jet fuel wasn't a factor in the collapse of WTC 7, and it's a valid question to consider how a steel-framed building could collapse due to fire alone. It's true that total collapses of steel high-rises due to fire are rare.

However, the NIST investigation concluded that the collapse of WTC 7 was a unique event resulting from a combination of factors:

Uncontrolled Fires: Debris from the collapse of WTC 1 ignited fires on multiple floors of WTC 7. These fires burned for several hours and were not effectively fought due to the damage to the water mains that supplied the sprinkler system on the lower floors. Structural Damage: The falling debris from the North Tower also caused structural damage to WTC 7. Thermal Expansion: The prolonged and intense fires caused significant thermal expansion of the steel beams and girders. This expansion led to a critical structural column (Column 79) buckling, according to NIST's findings. Progressive Collapse: The failure of Column 79 then initiated a progressive collapse, where the failure of one structural element led to the sequential failure of others, eventually bringing down the entire building. NIST acknowledged that the fire-induced progressive collapse of WTC 7 was an "extraordinary event" and the first known instance of a steel high-rise collapsing primarily due to uncontrolled fires. Their detailed analysis, using computer modeling, aimed to explain this unprecedented event based on the evidence gathered.

While other skyscrapers have experienced severe fires without collapsing, the specific circumstances of WTC 7, including the structural damage, the extent and duration of the uncontrolled fires, and the resulting thermal expansion, were determined by NIST to be the cause of its collapse.

I guess why this was different was because the water mains aren't fucked in these other skyscraper fires.

Building 7 during 9/11. Was a BBC news report where they talked about building 7 collapsing, meanwhile it was in the background of the reporter.

You are likely referring to a widely discussed moment related to the collapse of 7 World Trade Center (Building 7) on September 11, 2001.

It's true that the BBC reported on the collapse of Building 7 before it actually happened and while the building was visible in the background of the live broadcast. This has become a key point for conspiracy theorists who argue that the collapse was planned.

However, the BBC has addressed this error multiple times. Their explanation is that in the chaotic and быстро меняющейся situation of 9/11, they were relying on information from news agencies, including Reuters, which had incorrectly reported the building's collapse. Reuters later issued a correction.

Richard Porter, who was a senior editor in the BBC's global news service at the time, explained in a 2007 blog post that:

They were monitoring various news sources and emergency services reports. There was a general understanding that Building 7 was in danger of collapse due to the extensive fires caused by debris from the Twin Towers. Other news outlets, including CNN, also reported the building's collapse or imminent collapse before it occurred. The early report was a mistake made in the confusion of the day and not evidence of any prior knowledge or conspiracy. The 47-story Building 7 ultimately collapsed at 5:20 PM Eastern Time on September 11, 2001, several hours after the collapse of the North and South Towers. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conducted an extensive investigation and concluded that the collapse 1 was due to uncontrolled fires caused by debris from the collapse of the North Tower, which weakened the building's steel structure. 2   While the BBC's reporting error is a documented fact, it is widely considered to be a case of misinformation during a chaotic event rather than evidence of a conspiracy.

What's up with it using a couple Russian words in that last response. I looked up what it meant in translate.

быстро меняющейся, means "rapidly changing"

1. Posting your entire chat is gay.
2. ChatGPT is only repeating what other people have written. It does not 'think'

Have you ever seen that there were hundreds of melted cars near the twin towers on 9/11…

https://thenarrowgateweb.com/2016/08/13/energy-weapons-teslas-suppressed-technologies/#jp-carousel-17570

To try to find out what happened to these incinerated cars, lets park those cars for a minute, and draw a straight line from the middle of Ground Zero through the point where the two red lines on Vesey St. and Church St. meet…

https://thenarrowgateweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/capture.jpg?w=527&h=399

https://thenarrowgateweb.com/2016/08/13/energy-weapons-teslas-suppressed-technologies/#jp-carousel-17598

https://thenarrowgateweb.com/2016/08/13/energy-weapons-teslas-suppressed-technologies/#jp-carousel-17603

https://thenarrowgateweb.com/2016/08/13/energy-weapons-teslas-suppressed-technologies/#jp-carousel-17606

Brookhaven particle accelerator

So the facility at Brookhaven – built in 1947, is perfectly aligned (i.e. aimed) at Ground Zero, 61.16 miles away…

61.16 miles away. Hmmmm upside down mirror number 911 both forwards and backwards interesting....

EDIT: "Upside down" and "both"