Putting objects into a stable orbit is not hard either.
What does become hard is when you start throwing more and more forces into the mix. The simulation in my game only does forces between two objects, because the nbody problem becomes very computationally complex, very quickly.
In the 1840s, Urbain Le Verrier used Newtonian mechanics to predict the position of the then-undiscovered planet Neptune after analyzing perturbations in the orbit of Uranus. Subsequent observations of Neptune in the late 19th century led astronomers to speculate that Uranus's orbit was being disturbed by another planet besides Neptune.[16]
In 1906, Percival Lowell—a wealthy Bostonian who had founded Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona, in 1894—started an extensive project in search of a possible ninth planet, which he termed "Planet X".[17] By 1909, Lowell and William H. Pickering had suggested several possible celestial coordinates for such a planet.[18] Lowell and his observatory conducted his search, using mathematical calculations made by Elizabeth Williams, until his death in 1916, but to no avail. Unknown to Lowell, his surveys had captured two faint images of Pluto on March 19 and April 7, 1915, but they were not recognized for what they were.[18][19] There are fourteen other known precovery observations, with the earliest made by the Yerkes Observatory on August 20, 1909.[20]
However,[15]: 27 its planetary status was questioned when it was found to be much smaller than expected. These doubts increased following the discovery of additional objects in the Kuiper belt starting in the 1990s, particularly the more massive scattered disk object Eris in 2005. In 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) formally redefined the term planet to exclude dwarf planets such as Pluto. Many planetary astronomers, however, continue to consider Pluto and other dwarf planets to be planets.
I do question if we made it to the moon, because if we did I dont know why we left.
But the movements of the planets and stars are based in patterns and these mathematics support what is the currently accepted mainstream theory. Obviously someone thousands of years ago figured out the same thing, without satellites or modern computers.
The Antikythera mechanism is the oldest known analog computer, a complex ancient Greek mechanical device discovered in a shipwreck off the Greek island of Antikythera, used to calculate and display astronomical phenomena, including predicting eclipses and tracking the positions of the sun, moon, and planets
These things have been written about in old legends and mainstream science said it was impossible for so many years. But yet the proof does exist. So who knows.
I still tend to believe some of these old legends that the gods gave humanity this information.
No they just give you a crazy formula that probably changes every now and then because of new discoveries.
You will never know anyway.
And in nature you cant seperate the forces that are happening, like you do in your game. So that means you cant replicate the same situation with the numbers you were given in the first place. If nature is all mathematics then it should all be a lot easier to recreate.
The problem here is, that you still work with an analog to digital conversion.
People say, yeah nothing is real because the electrics in you brain are processing the outside info, but that does not make us digital like people tend to think. Its the result of the processing that gives of the electric charges in your brain. Our aether is electro magnetic because of the sun. Thats why the oceans have currents and freshwater does not.
Its actually not crazy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PooFvQEN4n8
Same math I used in my game I want to publish.
https://streamable.com/f8q8cf
Putting objects into a stable orbit is not hard either.
What does become hard is when you start throwing more and more forces into the mix. The simulation in my game only does forces between two objects, because the nbody problem becomes very computationally complex, very quickly.
This is why they know planet x is out there.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto
I do question if we made it to the moon, because if we did I dont know why we left.
But the movements of the planets and stars are based in patterns and these mathematics support what is the currently accepted mainstream theory. Obviously someone thousands of years ago figured out the same thing, without satellites or modern computers.
These things have been written about in old legends and mainstream science said it was impossible for so many years. But yet the proof does exist. So who knows.
I still tend to believe some of these old legends that the gods gave humanity this information.
No they just give you a crazy formula that probably changes every now and then because of new discoveries. You will never know anyway.
And in nature you cant seperate the forces that are happening, like you do in your game. So that means you cant replicate the same situation with the numbers you were given in the first place. If nature is all mathematics then it should all be a lot easier to recreate.
The problem here is, that you still work with an analog to digital conversion. People say, yeah nothing is real because the electrics in you brain are processing the outside info, but that does not make us digital like people tend to think. Its the result of the processing that gives of the electric charges in your brain. Our aether is electro magnetic because of the sun. Thats why the oceans have currents and freshwater does not.
Space is fake and gay.