TL;DR: We find little-known, very curious and highly unlikely connections between the items mentioned in the title. You’re free to believe it’s all mere coincidence, but you should probably wait to decide that until the end.

Disclaimer: I always hate to begin by “giving the answer”, but once again I consider it necessary to properly interpret the significance of the references we’ll see. Probably all the material will be unfamiliar. If you’ve heard about these things before, it was certainly because you were going to be handed some disinfo right after.

James Cameron, A+++ Hollywood royalty, is no Illuminatus. Rather, he’s an asset, out on the periphery of those who really do arrange history, and who you’ve never heard of. Well, you may have heard of them, but you definitely had no idea “who they really were”.

Let me begin by raising your suspicions about James with what I would say is the highest-profile hoax he’s been involved in selling us: the purported sinking of the Titanic. It really was an iconic psyop, a “conspiracy theory” touchstone. All the conspiracy theories are wrong, of course, but we hit closest to the mark with this landmark paper:

The Titanic: the Fraud that Keeps on Giving (Miles Mathis 10/2/2018 39-page PDF)

Let me say two things right away: First, if you cannot set aside whatever objections you have and tentatively accept the thesis that the boat never sank and is not on the bottom of the ocean, turn back now. The sea of your psyche will only grow more turbulent from here.

Second, the author of the paper—as I have disclaimed many times—is a disinfo agent. He surfaces (haha) plenty of evidence that you can validate for yourself to support the basic thesis. Remember what I said about only being familiar with these topics in the context of disinformation? Well, we got an example right away.

Begin by realizing that Cameron made a whole big giant blockbuster movie about the sinking, didn’t he? You can look up the numbers, but the production budget was (for the time) an eye-popping amount. There was also an equally large marketing budget. Can you see in a new light why “They” would bankroll such things? If the project makes money, great. If it loses money, well, everybody knows the boat sank. They just saw it sink, didn’t they?

Perhaps at this point you’re cutting Jim some slack. You may be thinking that you could make a movie about landing on the Moon without anyone ever having landed on the Moon, right? (Hello, Stanley Kubrick!) But the thing is, Cameron supposedly personally landed on the site of the wreck. Multiple times, actually:

James Cameron has visited Titanic wreckage 33 times. Here’s what he said about the Titan (Deseret News 6/3/2023)

You like that? I’ll top it:

James Cameron was underwater in a Titanic submersible when 9/11 happened (DailyO 6/22/2023)

I’m going to say that if, at this point, you aren’t certain that Cameron is an asset, turn back now. From here, it’s a rocket trip to Bizarro World which will make no sense at all as evidence if you’re still thinking he’s nothing more than some dude that likes to make movies. Our rocket now sets course for the fake Charlie Manson murders, but to get there we’ll have to go through the fake Salem Witch Trials of 1692. See what I mean? Don’t worry, we’ll break all this down.

Just like in conventional Intelligence work (which I suppose is just another form of what we’re discussing), an asset like James Cameron will have a handler. I’ve seen such situations before, and I went to look at his wives, particularly his first. My first instinct was correct: it was Sharon Williams.

A lot of history has been orchestrated by a small group of families, and they are not the ones you think (which is how disinfo works). A lot of my research has centered on them, and one of their hallmark events was the fake Salem Witch Trials (10/19/2015 17-page PDF same disclaimer about Mathis). If you look at the list of people of the Salem witch trials, you’ll find the name Williams. Sure, the name is not uncommon, but you have to admit it’s already strange. We are not done with that list, either.

Try to find any information on this Sharon Williams. Good luck, she’s a ghost. You can’t know anything about her, but you should be able to know that would fit the profile. Also, history isn’t typically hidden, per se, it’s just that the “red strings” that connect events get snipped, making us lose all sense of what happened. Here’s wiki at work with two sentences that bridge a section break:

After the excitement of seeing Star Wars in 1977, Cameron quit his job as a truck driver to enter the film industry. [section break] Cameron's directing career began in 1978. After borrowing money from a consortium of dentists….

“Hey, I’m tired of being a truck driver, so why don’t you give me twenty grand so I can quit and become a rich Hollywood movie director? It’s a slam dunk!” Is that what you think happened? Me neither. We can fill in a bit of detail here:

Staying married to Cameron: A modern Henry VIII? Staying married to the “scariest man in Hollywood” is no easy feat… (Gulf News 7/22/2019)

They were married for 12 years and she supported his film-making ambitions, working two jobs, as he gained an apprenticeship at the lowbudget New World Studio. They split when he started making The Terminator, an idea that came to him in a dream, and he got together with his second wife, Terminator producer Gale Anne Hurd.

Does that fit the profile of a handler, setting someone up in their career until a handoff? You might have to widen your sense of “handler” as something more than a CIA hack in a cheap suit dropping off microfilm. And we’re just going to skip over “New World”.

Speaking of the film that launched the James Cameron we know, we find some curious information in this article:

James Cameron’s First Wife Inspired Terminator’s Sarah Connor (The Terminator Fans 6/20/2022)

Most Terminator Fans will know that The Terminator was inspired by a nightmarish fever dream James Cameron had whilst filming Piranha II: The Spawning – but the real life inspiration for his feminist icon Sarah Connor… is far more grounded in reality; as the waitress turned mother of the future was actually inspired by James Cameron’s first wife, Sharon Williams.

Now, stop and think about the plot of that movie. It’s not really about robots and guns and chases, is it? The soul of it is a very special mother, literally the mother of the savior of humanity. Although there’s no virgin birth this time, it’s still pretty unique: the father is a soldier sent back in time by his future son. Further, it’s not simply that the mother gives birth to the son, she must guard him against a (spoiler: nearly) indestructible assassin and train him to lead a rebellion to prevent the very extermination of humanity. Go, motherhood!

Except Sharon Williams was not a mother. Childless young wives and infertility were not “things” back in the 70’s when they were first married, but Sharon and James had no children. Or so we are to believe. You may think differently in a bit.

There are no photos of Sharon anywhere I can find, but in that same article there is a drawing of her that Cameron made in 1973. That was only four years after the fake Manson murders, which may seem like a pretty random thing to observe.

But look at the drawing: Sharon Williams is reclining on a couch draped with an American flag. You know who else evidently reclined on a couch draped with an American flag? Sharon Tate. You can see it in crime scene pictures included in this analysis:

The Tate Murders were a False Flag (Miles Mathis 6/29/2014 (95-page PDF)

Yes, Mathis again, but again an event that was positively faked. One of the fake victims was Abigail “Gibby” Folger, daughter of Peter Folger and heiress to the Folger Coffee fortune. Well guess what: go back to that witch trial list and make sure you can find “Bethshua/Bethsheba Folger-Pope”. Gibby is a direct descendant of a man from the 1600’s also named Peter Folger, and Bethshua was his daughter. Also, Bethshua was the maternal aunt of Ben Franklin. See how this stuff keeps going?

Of all the things in here you might have a hard time believing, one of them is that we are only now getting to what brought me here today: another bullshit article from the BBC with more bullshit about the story that will not sink:

Titanic scan reveals ground-breaking details of ship's final hours (BBC 4/8/2025)

Yes, more nonsense, but there’s something quite bizarre I need you to notice in it concerning “Parks Stephenson, a Titanic analyst”: they repeat his name three additional times, but each time they use the full “Parks Stephenson”. I have never seen anything like it before and would challenge anyone to produce a similar example. It’s baffling! Some kind of magic(k)? Who cares, there it is.

Let me get my thesis right out before you fall asleep: I submit that “Parks Stephenson” is a fake name and he’s actually the son of James and Sharon. Tall claim, but hear me out.

First up, his bio is bullshit. He supposedly went to the US Naval Academy and is both a submariner and naval flight officer. Could not decide, or just that good? They also say that in the same four years he earned a Masters in Political Science from Auburn University. You can look up other articles and interviews which mention his other incredible accomplishments. I do not find them credible. One example would be this article:

From the Titanic to Baton Rouge, Parks Stephenson looks from the past to the future (The Advocate 11/10/2022) (<-- “The Advocate” was also the name of a famous gay newspaper back in the “gays rights” days and thus almost certainly run by Operation Mockingbird—funny!)

We find out he was an aerospace engineer and was fascinated with the Titanic since childhood. Cool story, bro. There’s a picture of him and James Cameron together and the ages seem right, but also look at the one up top of “Parks” as an older man. Now look up some pics of James Cameron with a salt-and-pepper beard. You decide.

But why would I think “Parks Stephenson” is a fake name? First, what kind of name is “Parks”? A dumb one you’ve never heard before, yes, but there’s something I haven’t written up yet so I’ll be brief: There was a famous actor from the 70’s through the 90’s named Parker Stevenson. His real name was Richard Stevenson Parker Jr. Look at that Salem list again.

Stevenson was by far best known for his role in a very popular TV series called The Hardy Boys/Nancy Drew Mysteries. It turns out that the fictional setting of the show and the youth novels on which it was based is a thinly disguised Salem, Massachusetts. Whaddaya know. Nancy Drew was eventually played by an actress whose real name is Janet Louise Johnson.

If anyone could possibly think I could stitch this all together instead of it just being there for me to find, I thank you for your estimation of my skills. For everyone, though, thanks for reading!