Because code/codex (systematic compilation of) can only be applied after industrial production. Codes harvest production...if consented to.
Any suggested law tempts a gentile to give consent to a jewish sovereign. Tempting consent by suggestion implies the systematic compilation of gentiles (commonwealth) under a jew (sovereign).
A jew tricks codified gentiles to produce their own harvesting. Using the products to distract from this implies magic/sorcery/witchcraft/spellcraft etc.
pure censorship
A contradiction in terms (terminology aka terminal logic) to distract from ones free will of choice to ignore purification (discernment) for self imposed censorship (ignorance).
Why do they have an international law that extends the definition
a) Being implies within natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater). A jew suggest an internal (national) vs external (international) conflict of reason to trick each gentile to ignore being the internal (inter) native (nat) of all (al) action (ion).
b) Definite implies affixed, and a gentiles consent holding onto a suggested definition by a jew affixes it within ones mind/memory, which represents ones ignorance of nature moving.
It's the moving force of nature, which the ignorant one within, perceives as the expansion of the held onto definition. Nature implies an ongoing process...any definition held onto implies a self imposed constipation.
extends the definition of child porn to literally everything?
Buying into sells self out, which is why porn/pornē - "prostitute" drives sales.
Porn thrived under the "teen" label, which tempted many to seek fresh products from few. Afterward the "teen" category was switched with "amateur", which represents gentiles industrially producing fresh content by themselves, and for one another, which frees each jew for control over the hub of porn aka from production towards distribution.
Child porn isn't mainly about the children, but about porn watchers being "guilty", while seeking "innocence" in fresh products. And porn isn't mainly about the sins of the flesh either, but about new (suggested) over old (perceivable) aka ignoring reality for fiction.
Ignoring perceivable for suggested "prostitutes" ones choice to a chosen ones will...porn is about making fresh stale. Child-porn has to be both advertised and curtailed, to trick stale gentiles into believing there's fresh produce left.
Because code/codex (systematic compilation of) can only be applied after industrial production. Codes harvest production...if consented to.
Any suggested law tempts a gentile to give consent to a jewish sovereign. Tempting consent by suggestion implies the systematic compilation of gentiles (commonwealth) under a jew (sovereign).
A jew tricks codified gentiles to produce their own harvesting. Using the products to distract from this implies magic/sorcery/witchcraft/spellcraft etc.
A contradiction in terms (terminology aka terminal logic) to distract from ones free will of choice to ignore purification (discernment) for self imposed censorship (ignorance).
a) Being implies within natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater). A jew suggest an internal (national) vs external (international) conflict of reason to trick each gentile to ignore being the internal (inter) native (nat) of all (al) action (ion).
b) Definite implies affixed, and a gentiles consent holding onto a suggested definition by a jew affixes it within ones mind/memory, which represents ones ignorance of nature moving.
It's the moving force of nature, which the ignorant one within, perceives as the expansion of the held onto definition. Nature implies an ongoing process...any definition held onto implies a self imposed constipation.
Buying into sells self out, which is why porn/pornē - "prostitute" drives sales.
Porn thrived under the "teen" label, which tempted many to seek fresh products from few. Afterward the "teen" category was switched with "amateur", which represents gentiles industrially producing fresh content by themselves, and for one another, which frees each jew for control over the hub of porn aka from production towards distribution.
Child porn isn't mainly about the children, but about porn watchers being "guilty", while seeking "innocence" in fresh products. And porn isn't mainly about the sins of the flesh either, but about new (suggested) over old (perceivable) aka ignoring reality for fiction.
Ignoring perceivable for suggested "prostitutes" ones choice to a chosen ones will...porn is about making fresh stale. Child-porn has to be both advertised and curtailed, to trick stale gentiles into believing there's fresh produce left.