A few months ago I predicted the second dip coming of a double dip crash. https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/19A1CCAm14/double-dip-recession--crash-inco/c
The past week or so has seen a major drop in the stock market and a major rise in risk off assets. We've seen gold for the first time in history top $3,000 nominally in spot price. Some say this is the all time high in real terms, but they are wrong. The CPI is a lie. According to my calculations the real all time high for gold is closer to $4500 in today's dollars.
So far this inverse correlation with the stock market is in play for precious metals. In this bubble economy every asset has its day. Tech stocks, real estate, even crypto had their day and reached their limits for a while. When all those numbers are going down, the flight to safety becomes another bubble in safe haven assets. The market being forward looking, this new bubble was already under way but has accelerated now, and more of the high risk "risk off" plays are taking off.
Personally I'm going to let things run for the year as the market (possibly) continues to crash and then plan a proper exit when other assets start looking like a better deal. But if the normal stock market rebounds, well I probably won't make another post about that 🤣.
Either way, praise God for another day, and remember money is just a tool to be used in His service. It is a fun game to play, but not an end in and of itself.
Nope. "Luciferianism" is so broadly defined that people are quick to twist anything they don't like into some vague symbolism. Remember that time where people would try and find messages by playing records backwards?
The same media that predicted the second dip? :)
I was mostly curious about your response to this part of the conversation, because I think it could lead to a very interesting discussion about theism, or lack thereof, and what it leads to:
Serving yourself can certainly be as simple as eating right, taking time away from distracting things, letting go of worries that are no longer important. You are jumping to a far extreme when serving yourself can be an act of kindness, especially when paired with serving your community, something else I had mentioned.
Prayer or not, the actions are what matter most.
Perhaps, for instance, while you believe I am not aligning myself with the spiritual forces for good, my actions may be of someone who would be. Perhaps my actions are ones that serve your lord, and would be loved by your god, because of the kindness I show to others, to make the world we live in better.
Do you find it impossible that someone who doesn't believe in the same things you do can also be a force of good in the world, that your god smiles upon?
It's not though. Luciferianism is an inversion of the Biblical narrative placing God as the Devil and glorifying the actual Devil. All those groups I mentioned can be shown doing this. It's not vague or broad, but correctly labelled Luciferian.
You've counted up your good deeds and darn it you like yourself, so why would you need to change and how could you be in sin? Because it's not about how much you like yourself or counting up good deeds. That can't be the standard, the only objective standard has to be of God.
It's quite explicitly stated in the Bible that denying God, not being God-fearing, etc is not smiled upon. Jesus Christ (who left wingers love to pretend they are like) told us the most important commandment is to love the Lord your God and live by faith. He proclaimed, upon entering a city, to "repent". He asked us to be born again in the Holy spirit.
Actions are downstream from that. If the upstream source (your spiritual alignment) is off the downstream will be impacted in some way, and this is what sin is. It may include atheism, or a false gospel, or following a false religion.
If you're running from prayer and acknowledgement of God, then you are running from the clarity of the Holy Spirit. There is no good reason to do that.
Right but where is the actual devil being glorified? That's where people start to stretch their definitions. It's certainly vague/broad.
I agree! So I'm not sure why you feel like I'm not meeting the standard if even you aren't aware of my actions.
Matthew 25: "34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’"
These on the right didn't even know they were doing anything for god/in the name of god, yet were accepted through their actions.
Matthew 7:21-23, Jesus says, “Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter. On judgment day many will say to me, ‘Lord! Lord! We prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed many miracles in your name.’ But I will reply, ‘I never knew you. Get away from me, you who break God’s laws.’
Seems pretty clear to me that only those who actually do the will of god will be let into the kingdom of heaven.
Explicitly in the writings of the most respected Freemasons (Albert Pike and Manly P Hall). Explicitly in the writings of Theosophist Helena Blavatsky and Alice Bailey. Explicitly by the founder of Scientology who according to his own son considered himself the antiChrist who was also looking to create a "moon child" in something they called the "Babalon Working" with Satanist Jack Parsons. So he either wanted to be the antiChrist or create him himself. https://www.reddit.com/r/behindthebastards/comments/fhg8w0/how_l_ron_hubbard_made_an_antichrist_using_sex/ The New Age movement was spawned by Freemasonic and Theosophic teachings. The original New Age magazine is quite explicitly a Freemason publication (starting in the early 1900s) https://www.amazon.com/New-Age-Magazine-January-Illustrated/dp/B001X1DCYQ. An analysis of New Age teachings shows they teach directly from Theosophy without citing their Luciferian authors. There is nothing vague about it, and it isn't a stretch to see they are all one in the same spiritually, rooted in Luciferianism.
And that's not even getting into the outright Crowleyian occult practitioners in Hollywood. You should watch "They Sold Their Souls for Rock N Roll" documentary series by Good Fight Ministries. You'd be shocked how many popular entertainers are lovers of Crowley, a man who practiced dark magic and called himself "The Beast 666", and who hated Jesus Christ.
No you didn't agree with me, you missed my point completely. Actions are downstream from spiritual alignment. The Bible is clear that you are not working your way into heaven. You don't just get to do some good deeds (which you focus on) and proclaim yourself good and saved.
What part of "repent" and "you must be born again" means "you must do more good actions and don't worry about recognizing the truth of God or prayer"?
Is the sole goal of luciferianism just to...make people not pray? That seems pretty tame, considering the alternate goals of some religious/cult movements. I mean, considering I am someone who watches hollywood movies and listens to rock and roll music, I haven't been driven to any sort of violence or sacrifice or evil or anything like that. If not praying is the consequence...it'd take a lot of convincing for me to believe that it should be considered "evil."
Again, I agree with this. I'm not proclaiming myself as good or saved. I freely admit that I have my flaws and, ultimately, I don't know whether or not I am saved. After all, only god can judge that of me.
What I do know is that my actions, by my knowledge, certainly align with many teachings of your lord. It seems to me that I do step in line with a lot of the behaviors encouraged by the bible, so it's hard to understand what I may be doing that's wrong.
None of those parts. Happy to clear that up for you.