The ultimate agenda or desired consequence of a planned series of events (often elaborate and unknown to outsiders).
In the business world its ideally an ingenious business strategy for the purposes of market domination. In movies its often nefarious and the secret objective of a super villain.
However, an Endgame scenario does not need to be bad, it may ultimately be a miraculously good outcome for all, though usually a major component is the acquisition of power by the party who planned it, irrespective of the larger consequences to others, good or bad.
Informally, people may ask "what's your Endgame" after listening to your plans but not getting what the point of your plan actually is.
It's best used in relation to an ingenious plans that are in progress where the overarching goal (the Endgame) may not be obvious. Originates from the idea of playing lots of small games (or completing lots of tasks) in order to achieve a larger result.
Poor (or boring) use: the Endgame of a degree is to get a high paying job.
Okay use: the Endgame of a degree is to get yourself deeply involved in the universities alumni network, build relationships with specific people that otherwise would be difficult, and leverage all possible resources to launch a great business.
Great use (see example below). Google's Endgame is to develop super machine intelligence and take over the world.
a) Ultimate/ulter/al - "beyond" implies being (be) at a distance (yond) aka ones divided (dis) stance within all.
Being implies in-between (life) origin (inception) and outcome (death)...to measure towards outcome, shortens ones being.
b) Agenda implies action (cause); being implies reaction (effect)...seeking to reach an ultimate tempts one to ignore the cause of ones reactions.
unknown to outsiders
Being implies in-between (life) sides (inception/death)...one cannot be outside.
It's one consent to a suggestion of another, which establishes an insider vs outsider conflict of reason, with oneself being stuck in circular logic inside a conflict of reason against others, and those making the suggestions on the outside.
market domination
Being implies free (life) within dominance (inception towards death)...others trick one into a marketplace aka buying (consent) and selling (suggestion). The price of buying into is selling ones choice into bondage to a chosen one.
That's why the market domineers buyers and sellers.
outcome for all
Being implies one within all, hence each one (life) coming in (inception) and out (death) of all. Any outcome implies death for those who came into life.
what the point of your plan actually is
Being implies life sentenced from inception towards point of death aka ones plain/plan of existence.
the overarching goal
a) Inception > life > death implies an arch; a curvature; a temporary growth within ongoing loss...any goals flatten the curve.
b) Ones consent to the suggestion of another establishes a contract aka an ark of covenant... https://www.etymonline.com/word/covenant Those who suggest are permitted by those who consent to become "raiders of the lost ark"
playing lots
A lot implies ONES (partial) share within all (whole)...playing implies gambling oneself away to others aka casting lots.
all possible resources
Resource implies ones response (re) within source of all. Viewing others as resources (plural) tempts one (singular) to ignore source.
Possible implies able of potential aka ones response-ability (free will of choice). Choosing others as resources prevents ones potential from growing, while consuming others as well.
Within all...if one exploits other ones as resources; then that implies drainage of potential.
Google's Endgame
Few suggest many to put on google/goggle, hence viewing perceivable through the lens of suggested...consenting to that implies gambling life on death (end).
Google is called a search engine...if one searches for outcome, then one ignores being within (en) generation (gine), hence within energy.
a) Few suggest globe to confine many within a shape.
b) Few suggest techno/tekhnē - "artifice" to distract many from natural.
c) Few suggest cracy/kratos - "strength" to tempt consenting many to weaken themselves.
d) Few suggest what is to distract many from what was perceivable.
e) Few suggest outcome (end) to distract many from origin aka beginning/be-ginnan - "opening being"
f) Few suggest games to tempt many to gamble.
End-game:
a) Ultimate/ulter/al - "beyond" implies being (be) at a distance (yond) aka ones divided (dis) stance within all.
Being implies in-between (life) origin (inception) and outcome (death)...to measure towards outcome, shortens ones being.
b) Agenda implies action (cause); being implies reaction (effect)...seeking to reach an ultimate tempts one to ignore the cause of ones reactions.
Being implies in-between (life) sides (inception/death)...one cannot be outside.
It's one consent to a suggestion of another, which establishes an insider vs outsider conflict of reason, with oneself being stuck in circular logic inside a conflict of reason against others, and those making the suggestions on the outside.
Being implies free (life) within dominance (inception towards death)...others trick one into a marketplace aka buying (consent) and selling (suggestion). The price of buying into is selling ones choice into bondage to a chosen one.
That's why the market domineers buyers and sellers.
Being implies one within all, hence each one (life) coming in (inception) and out (death) of all. Any outcome implies death for those who came into life.
Being implies life sentenced from inception towards point of death aka ones plain/plan of existence.
a) Inception > life > death implies an arch; a curvature; a temporary growth within ongoing loss...any goals flatten the curve.
b) Ones consent to the suggestion of another establishes a contract aka an ark of covenant... https://www.etymonline.com/word/covenant Those who suggest are permitted by those who consent to become "raiders of the lost ark"
A lot implies ONES (partial) share within all (whole)...playing implies gambling oneself away to others aka casting lots.
Resource implies ones response (re) within source of all. Viewing others as resources (plural) tempts one (singular) to ignore source.
Possible implies able of potential aka ones response-ability (free will of choice). Choosing others as resources prevents ones potential from growing, while consuming others as well.
Within all...if one exploits other ones as resources; then that implies drainage of potential.
Few suggest many to put on google/goggle, hence viewing perceivable through the lens of suggested...consenting to that implies gambling life on death (end).
Google is called a search engine...if one searches for outcome, then one ignores being within (en) generation (gine), hence within energy.