There are several pieces of evidence that indicate Israel has little in the way of a nuclear arsenal.
One of those would be that the nukes they used to blow up Fukushima were antiquated copies of the Hiroshima "gun type" uranium bomb. Also, they had to steal from the US probably about 50 5kT nukes, one of which was used a few months later in the Beirut Port bombing.
If they had an arsenal of several hundred nukes with the capability to produce more, there's no way they would be reduced to these type of shenanigans. Simple conclusion: they do not possess such an arsenal.
So the grand psyop is that they maintain a policy of "strategic obfuscation" or whatever they call it, and everyone thinks that means the Jews definitely have a load of nukes but are getting away with it. True, but only to a minimal extent.
Then every once in a while they run a minor gag like the present one, along the lines of a car salesman walking out of the room to speak to the manager but accidentally leaving the factory invoice on the table. Oh, ooops.
Another example was back in 2015 when DefSec Colin Powell had his AOL mail account (yes, AOL) hacked where it was "revealed" that he was of the opinion that Israel had "200 nukes all pointed at Iran". So the Heebs get to slyly threaten Iran as a bonus. (Hey, "sly" and a "bonus", so right on brand, isn't it?)
I think upper echelon Jews who own the US may not have placed Nukes under direct Jewish militias (Israeli) control for fear they may recklessly use them prematurely to the determent of Jewish militias themselves.
Same as with the 1973 October war. Upper echelon Jews understood the long term consequences and thought the better of it that Jewish militias should not take the Sinai just yet and should be restrained until it's time.
When the time comes and upper echelon Jews decide their militias in the middle east need to use those nukes they will happily provide them.
There are several pieces of evidence that indicate Israel has little in the way of a nuclear arsenal.
One of those would be that the nukes they used to blow up Fukushima were antiquated copies of the Hiroshima "gun type" uranium bomb. Also, they had to steal from the US probably about 50 5kT nukes, one of which was used a few months later in the Beirut Port bombing.
If they had an arsenal of several hundred nukes with the capability to produce more, there's no way they would be reduced to these type of shenanigans. Simple conclusion: they do not possess such an arsenal.
So the grand psyop is that they maintain a policy of "strategic obfuscation" or whatever they call it, and everyone thinks that means the Jews definitely have a load of nukes but are getting away with it. True, but only to a minimal extent.
Then every once in a while they run a minor gag like the present one, along the lines of a car salesman walking out of the room to speak to the manager but accidentally leaving the factory invoice on the table. Oh, ooops.
Another example was back in 2015 when DefSec Colin Powell had his AOL mail account (yes, AOL) hacked where it was "revealed" that he was of the opinion that Israel had "200 nukes all pointed at Iran". So the Heebs get to slyly threaten Iran as a bonus. (Hey, "sly" and a "bonus", so right on brand, isn't it?)
I think upper echelon Jews who own the US may not have placed Nukes under direct Jewish militias (Israeli) control for fear they may recklessly use them prematurely to the determent of Jewish militias themselves.
Same as with the 1973 October war. Upper echelon Jews understood the long term consequences and thought the better of it that Jewish militias should not take the Sinai just yet and should be restrained until it's time.
When the time comes and upper echelon Jews decide their militias in the middle east need to use those nukes they will happily provide them.