You can go to jail, just for researching this, eh. So it's been kind of rough to sit there watching this doc. But when it got into this part, you pay attention and don't feel like doing other things. You can actually watch it.

It's too long to upload a clip here. But I got the transcript. Used the closed captioning but that has time-stamps all over. I use chat gpt to remove it but later it realizes what's going on and says it can't continue. It's cause it's a conflict of interest, where the facts are going against "history". Then when you get it to analyze what's being said here, where, they go research stuff and things actually point towards the opposite. Then it shuts it down and doesn't like going there.

Looking at pictures of inside there, the chimneys, seems like a "renovation" where it's added later and wouldn't be rough like that, the way things are when they're built. Then, just this "gas".. nothing's air-tight. Seems like this stuff is flammable too and would explode, but supposedly they got this incinerator right by there. On and on.

How much characters is this transcript.. 12k.. should fit in here.

---

Part 21 Adolf Hitler - The Greatest Story NEVER Told!

In 1992, a brilliant young Jewish revisionist named David Cole made a groundbreaking documentary about the Holocaust.

This is an edited version of his work.

The complete documentary "Cole in Auschwitz" can be viewed on the internet.

I know from years of my own research and the research of others that proofs of the Holocaust are few.

Literally, all there is are the "eyewitness" testimonies and postwar confessions.

There's no picture, plan, or wartime document dealing with homicidal gas chambers or a plan to exterminate the Jews.

And we can't use the excuse that the Nazis destroyed all the evidence because after we had broken the German code, we were able to intercept their secret transmissions, including those that came from Auschwitz.

The key to understanding the Holocaust story is understanding the true nature of the things passed off as "proofs."

Everything that is used as evidence of the Holocaust also can be said to have a perfectly normal explanation.

For example, these exhibits are said to be the material "proofs" of exterminations.

There's the piles of human hair. But what does that prove?

It's acknowledged that each inmate had his or her head shaved because of the lice problem.

That's not denied, so why wouldn't there be piles of human hair?

What about the piles of shoes and clothing; is that a proof?

It's a fact that the prisoners were issued a uniform upon arrival, including shoes.

So why wouldn't there be piles of inmates' shoes and clothing?

It doesn't prove anybody was killed.

What about the canisters of gas?

No one denies that Zyklon B was used to disinfect clothes and also buildings.

Zyklon B was one of the premier pest control agents in Europe at that time.

It was present in most of the concentration camps, including those that are not said to have had homicidal gas chambers in them.

The typhus epidemic that spread throughout Europe during the war and also spread through the camps called for stringent lice control procedures.

So what other proofs are offered?

Well, there's the usual pictures of sick inmates, which proves the ground-breaking thesis that people got sick in the camp.

Once again, I'll add that nobody denies the typhus epidemic, which resulted in many deaths.

Then there's the artwork and the pictures of children.

But at this point, it's looking pretty bad for somebody looking for objective proofs of the gas chamber.

And some of the proofs they present actually work against the concept.

For example, they have one of several aerial photographs taken at Auschwitz by the Allies during the war.

They don't mention, however, that when blown up, these photos don't show people being gassed or bodies being burned, even though they were taken during the time killings were said to be going on almost non-stop.

Once inside, we can see why revisionists have had such a field day with this building:

Obvious marks on the walls and floors, where apparently walls had been knocked down.

Equally obvious holes in the floor where bathroom facilities had been.

We maintain that, unlike the large hollow chamber we now see, this room had once been five rooms, including a bathroom.

Yet the building does have what appears to be evidence of criminal usage:

Four holes in the ceiling, which lead to the roof where four little chimneys stand.

It is said that through these four holes, Zyklon B crystals were dropped.

And indeed, there seems to be no other explanation for them.

Do these holes prove homicidal gassings?

Revisionists have claimed in the past that these holes were added after the camp's liberation and that the inside walls were knocked down and the bathroom facilities removed to make the room look like a big gas chamber.

Let's start again talking about this building here.

This is a crematorium/gas chamber.

But this is a reconstruction?

It is in original state.

Original? Original state. It is an original part. Original.

Oh, it is original?

Original, in through this chimney was thrown Zyklon B.

Later, a senior official would confirm that the holes in the roof had been built after the war.

Are those the original holes in the ceiling?

No. They've been rebuilt? Yes. After the war?

After the war, yes. Dr. Franciszek Piper, the senior curator and director of archives at the Auschwitz State Museum, admitted on camera to David Cole that "Krema 1," the alleged "homicidal gas chamber" at the Auschwitz main camp, was in fact fabricated after the war by the Soviet Union under direct orders of Stalin.

This includes the fake chimney, that is not even connected with the crematorium.

This is Auschwitz-Birkenau in an Allied aerial photo from September 1944.

The train that would come up, carrying the doomed inmates, you would have thousands of inmates being marched off the trains into one of these two gas chambers in full view of the entire camp.

This was a spectacle that nobody in the camp could miss; they would see thousands of people marching into those buildings and nobody coming out.

These were "gas chambers" that were not isolated from anyone, and indeed, when these aerial photographs were released in the late 70s, they contradicted many supposed eyewitness claims about how the Nazis had tried to camouflage the gas chambers at Birkenau.

Another question that should be asked:

Is there any Zyklon B residue in the gas chamber, knowing that cyanide gas would, in fact, leave a residue?

Conducted forensic examinations on the gas chambers at Auschwitz to answer that question.

He took samples from the four gas chambers at Birkenau, the one at the main camp, and the control sample from one of the disinfestation chambers that we know did use Zyklon B.

Now, the gas chamber samples showed almost no appreciable traces, whereas the disinfestation sample literally went right off the scale.

In 1990, the Institute of Forensic Research in Krakow decided to conduct their own forensic tests to see if they could refute Fred Leuchter's findings, and their own tests got back the same results.

In Canada in 1988, Ernst Zündel faced charges for Holocaust denial in a second trial.

He hired American Frederick A. Leuchter, a court-certified expert in gas execution technology.

After secretly conducting scientific experiments in camps such as Auschwitz in Poland, on his return he published his findings in the "Leuchter Report."

[after this chatgpt stopped transcribing the closed captioned text, removing time-stamps and I had to remove them manually]

I told Mr. Zundel and his defense team prior to my going, that if I did in fact find facilities that could have supported executions, not only whether they did, did support the executions, but only whether or not they could have sustained gas executions. I would make that very clear in my report. And that is what I would testify to, when I testified in court.

What aside from the samples convinced you that these facilities could not have been used then or now as execution facilities?

You must have gasketed doors, no windows. Means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out. If those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executies died, they certainly would have been blown to bits, when the gas exploded from a switch, the heat of a light bulb, or the gas approaching and getting in to the crematory furnace.

We're talking about brick and mortar buildings, without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors. In some cases without doors at all.

And with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility. I mean it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers.

There's no such a thing as an "eye witness". I have never seen a report that was written, by anyone, who had a valid description of what could of happened at a gassing.

So, the long and the short of it is, there are no eye witnesses, because there were no gassings.

I think it's necessary to put this matter in its proper historical perspective.

You see, we live in a time now when the old Soviet Union has fallen apart and it's now okay for both liberals and conservatives, as well as everybody else, to speak ill of the departed communist state.

But it was not always that way. During World War 2, the Soviets were more than just a military ally; their anti-Nazi propaganda was readily accepted by the other Allies because it served all of their purposes. The point is, that, as the victors, the Soviets got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact.

With the 20-20 hindsight we now have, the knowledge of Stalin's despotism, and the KGB's history of misinformation and deception, as well as the other camps in Poland; Majdanek. Belzec, Chelmno, Treblinka and Sobibor, we've had to rely on the Soviets for most of our information.

THE RISE AND FALL OF THE AUSCHWITZ DEATH TOLL

In Krakov, the trial of the principal culprits for the Auschwitz concentration camp came to an end before a Polish court. 1945- 300.000 dead.

Altogether nearly 300.000 people from the most different nations died in the Auschwitz concentration camp.

FOUR MILLION PEOPLE SUFERED AND DIED HERE AT THE HANDS OF THE NAZI MURDERERS BETWEEN THE YEARS 1940 AND 1945

1948- 4 Million

1989- 1.5 Million

ABOUT ONE AND A HALF MILLION MEN, WOMEN, AND CHILDREN, MAINLY JEWS FROM VARIOUS COUNTRIES OF EUROPE.

AUSCHWITZ - BIRKENAU 1940-1945

Deaths at Auschwitz drop by a huge 2.5 million, but still the total 6.000.000 deaths remains the same.

THE MEDIA HISTORY OF THE "SIX MILLION" 1915- 2013

... Six million Jews... Six Million Souls... 6.000,000 ... the 6.000.000 Jews... ... 6.000.000 IN... SIX MILLION JEWS ... "the European holocaust." ... A depressing picture of 6.000.000...

[those were newspaper clippings from years before the war, where they were using that number!]

PIERS MORGAN TONIGHT 2013

CNN - 2013

I believe in the inarguable fact, that 6 million Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler Nazis. I'm merely asking you, as a President of Iran, and as a scholar, do you believe 6 million Jews were killed by the Nazis, or do you think that is not true?

In a 2005 speech, Iran's former president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, caused an international uproar by describing the Holocaust as a fabricated legend promoted to protect Israel.

David Cole disappires after his 1994 appearance on the Phil Donahue show after receiving several death threats from Jewish extremists.

He recently emerged from hiding in 2013.

In Canada in 1988, Ernst Zündel was convicted and sentenced to a nine-month jail term after the court dismissed Leucher's testimony.

Later, Ernst Zündel will spent 2 years in solitary confinement in a Canadian jail before being deported to Germany to stand trial.

Fred Leuchter asked for a joint scientific investigation into the Holocust. It never happened. Insteed he was targeted by Jewish extremists and his career ruined.

Since its publication the Leuchter Report has earned legendary status in the world of Hoocaust Revisionism.

Denying the Holocaust is a criminal offence and carries a custodial sentence in several European counries.

The Holocaust is the ONLY event in history to be enforced by law.

Notable Political Prisoners:

1998. Jürgen Graf, Swiss Court 15 months imprisonment

1999. Gerhard Förster, Swiss Court 12 months imprisonment

2000. Gaston-Armand Amaudruz, Swiss Court 1 year imprisonment.

2001. David Irving, Austrian court. 1 year imprisonment.

2002. Germar Rudolf, German court. 21/2 years imprisonment.

2003. Ernst Zündel, German court. 5 years imprisonment.

2004. Wolfgang Fröhlich, Austrian court. 6 years imprisonment.

2005. Sylvia Stolz, German court. 3 1/2 years imprisonment.

2006. Horst Mahler, German court. 5 years imprisonment.

2007. Dirk Zimmerman, German court. 9 months imprisonment.

But I don't think 6 million Jews were gassed. Now be... be careful, I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German, or somebody with the German state, you could have me thrown in prison, before I leave Germany. I hope that's not your intention.

2009. Bishop Richard Williamson, German court, 12,000 fine

To be continued

---

Might still have text room here.. Then I'm looking up that documentary "Cole in Auschwitz" David Cole, they use in here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Cole_(journalist)

I'm there.. this guy sounds like he's Jewish.. yet he's researching this.. over there. Yeah.. so he's actually a Jew but he's looking into this stuff. Which, you'd think.. you'd go to prison for doing that, right. So this is a good one.

Then what's the deal with his name. "David Christopher Cole, also known as David Stein (born c. 1968), is an American film director. In the 1990s, he gained publicity as a Holocaust denier.[2] Much of the controversy Cole attracted resulted from the fact that he is Jewish. After changing his name to David Stein following death threats, "

"Life until 1998 Cole was raised in West Los Angeles as a secular Jew. "

So this guy's a Jew here. I haven't watch this yet.. it's an hour long. Where he's researching this and they used some of the footage in that 6hr doc. Plus it's on youtube.

David Cole In Auschwitz 1992 Documentary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jO659PP_unQ

Then you get the first comment.. "The truth doesn't need laws to protect it. In 18 countries you can go to jail for 5 years for even asking questions."

It's like WTF.. you can't even research or you go to jail, right.

But it kind of makes sense how the Russians would do that. They were trying to invade Russia. So they had a beef with these guys. But why would Germany have these super strict laws, if it's bogus.