Criminalizing art and fiction is a bridge too far for the United Nations - Prostasia Foundation
We analyze submissions received by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child to its proposal to ban art and fiction depicting minors and sex.
I do not hear this being brought up anywhere even when I was in r/conspiracy, before it was taken over by the UN.
This is not a child protection law. Listen. It is NOT a child protection law, this is to make sure you will be witch-hunted no matter where you go.
And witch-hunt they do.
While they cannot arrest you, the UN has a "gangster police" twitter mob made of paid shills and sockpuppets they use to enforce this.
And you expect that there are several legit weirdos that will believe in these lies.
Beware. One wrong step, you will be cancelled. You will roll over and die, and you will be happy.
There is a redditor in Seattle that now wears an eye patch over his left eye for stocking me back in 2018 when I was very prolific on reddit r/con in pointing out pdfs working for the system(State). Seems they caught on to who I actually am and had people follow me. The one person who decided to intervene did so when I had my brothers child with me. BIG MISTAKE!
Crime/krei - "to separate" contradicts the establishment of fictitious artifice by ones consent to the suggestion of another. Hence...
...uniting together that which reality sets apart.
Since the United Nations doesn't criminalize (separate) it instead is used to unite laws together by tricking the majority to give consent to suggested crimes.
Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) once again implies separation...not unification.
A contraindication in terms...pro (forwards) stasis (standing still).
a) Ones consent to suggested artifice implies ones banishment of perceivable nature, hence willingly ignoring reality for fiction.
b) Ban/bannan - "to summon, command, proclaim" implies the suggestions of few summoning, commanding and proclaiming towards the consent of many.
c) Just like with disarming a population, while simultaneously selling weapons...few are banning art, while selling art (and even giving it away for free) to many.
The issue with dividing (de) a captured moment (picture) is the suggestion thereof towards others, hence sharing the artificial depiction within the natural order.
This ties into child abuse, hence sharing abuse with others or artificially using others to abuse self. Masturbation isn't a victimless crime, otherwise porn wouldn't be free.