Viruses have always been a hoax.
Spanish flu nope
Trail of tears smallpox nope
AIDS nope
And of course bubonic plague nope.
There is no supporting evidence that there was a increase in population of rats. There's no evidence that supports fleas from those rats causing illness. And yet there is support of a huge portion of the population dying out.
The same authors? You just mean the same shitheads who starved and poisoned us is also the same shitheads who make the sun go dark? Is there any truth to the sun having gone dark before? I imagine if it were true it should be in the historical record all over
Famine is often the precursor of illness in ancient record, and that still follows through today. Everybody i know that claims to have long covid regularly eats garbage disguised as food.
And the same sheep probably lined up for all the vaxes. They are on 6.6 prescriptions by the time they are 60 that as supposedly need to balance their thyroid, hormones, blood pressure, etc.
The way start before you're born. You mom has to be awake. At least enough for you to keep your foreskins and avoid any vaccines, and to get pure protein and fats from birth, without ever a vegetable. You'd have to be trained from early age to meditate and connect with your soul, maintenance of our high connection to knowledge.
That last part was my personal theory, based on that I know this place isn't a planet and religions are obvious traps.
Is there no redemption in your philosophy? Certainly it would've been better to be born in such an auspicious family, but for those that weren't, do you see them as lost without hope? You reach a curious conclusion that provokes me to wonder: what separates such thoughts from religion?
I've seen you mention the flat earth thing a bit. Have you seen the recent video of the YouTube flat earth crowd going to Antarctica and seeing the 24-hour sun? They could not deny what they saw, but many were unsure how to interpret it.
Personally, I think sunsets are enough proof - I've seen the theories for how such things are supposed to work on FE, and accordingly the sun should dwindle to a distant point in the sky as it moves away and not drop below the horizon.
But you gave a fair answer in that it was thoroughly honest to the point of highlighting your own theories that you believe fact. Not many people would be that honest, so I tip my hat to you, sir.
Beers law. Sun wouldn't go to point, which is also supported by basic physics that most people just assume was already done for them by following the mainstream institutions. Becareful what flat earth psy op you think you're learning from. Just consider that the flat earth society is fake. Taken over by bad guys long ago. Can't share links because this place would just see them get deleted.
You have to figure it out. Actually try. Not just listen to this guy or that. Personally, I find Eric dubays voice annoying, but he is a good writer, he is consise at least. But you have to learn , or relearn things, to stop believing the deception you're in now. It's almost impossible to break the programming, good luck.
Beers law? Do you mean the the Beer-Lambert extinction law? Let's take a look at it.
Formally, it states that the intensity of radiation decays exponentially in the absorbance of the medium, and that said absorbance is proportional to the length of beam passing through the medium, the concentration of interacting matter along that path, and a constant representing said matter's propensity to interact.
Nothing in that would effect a light source dropping below the horizon, nor would it explain the light seeming to drop below the horizon if it is really moving away laterally. It almost sounds like you've just accepted this without thinking it through. I'm not trying to be contentious, but your talk about breaking programming falls flat if your explanations don't make sense.
Let's try a different tactic. I'll tell you what I would need to change my mind, and you tell me what you would need to change your mind. For my part, a physical model that accurately accounts moon passes and seasonal cycles would go a very long way toward legitimacy in my mind.
One common way that history is (re)written--although virtually unrecognized by the public and unquestioned by historians--is that "secret histories" are "discovered" long after they were purportedly written. And what do we find for Procopius himself?
Procopius's now famous Anecdota, also known as Secret History, was discovered centuries later at the Vatican Library in Rome and published in Lyon by Niccolò Alamanni in 1623.
So the Vatican only had a thousand years to dream something up? Sounds like it must be legit, but it's still something for everyone to keep in mind as you're trying to figure out just what the hell actually went on.
Viruses have always been a hoax. Spanish flu nope Trail of tears smallpox nope AIDS nope And of course bubonic plague nope. There is no supporting evidence that there was a increase in population of rats. There's no evidence that supports fleas from those rats causing illness. And yet there is support of a huge portion of the population dying out.
Maybe it's the fog
preach brother. Also a darkening of the sun was another event writing about by these same authors.
The same authors? You just mean the same shitheads who starved and poisoned us is also the same shitheads who make the sun go dark? Is there any truth to the sun having gone dark before? I imagine if it were true it should be in the historical record all over
From what I've seen, "doctors" seemed to be trying awfully hard to get people sick during the plague.
Famine is often the precursor of illness in ancient record, and that still follows through today. Everybody i know that claims to have long covid regularly eats garbage disguised as food.
And the same sheep probably lined up for all the vaxes. They are on 6.6 prescriptions by the time they are 60 that as supposedly need to balance their thyroid, hormones, blood pressure, etc.
The way start before you're born. You mom has to be awake. At least enough for you to keep your foreskins and avoid any vaccines, and to get pure protein and fats from birth, without ever a vegetable. You'd have to be trained from early age to meditate and connect with your soul, maintenance of our high connection to knowledge.
That last part was my personal theory, based on that I know this place isn't a planet and religions are obvious traps.
Is there no redemption in your philosophy? Certainly it would've been better to be born in such an auspicious family, but for those that weren't, do you see them as lost without hope? You reach a curious conclusion that provokes me to wonder: what separates such thoughts from religion?
I've seen you mention the flat earth thing a bit. Have you seen the recent video of the YouTube flat earth crowd going to Antarctica and seeing the 24-hour sun? They could not deny what they saw, but many were unsure how to interpret it.
Personally, I think sunsets are enough proof - I've seen the theories for how such things are supposed to work on FE, and accordingly the sun should dwindle to a distant point in the sky as it moves away and not drop below the horizon.
But you gave a fair answer in that it was thoroughly honest to the point of highlighting your own theories that you believe fact. Not many people would be that honest, so I tip my hat to you, sir.
Beers law. Sun wouldn't go to point, which is also supported by basic physics that most people just assume was already done for them by following the mainstream institutions. Becareful what flat earth psy op you think you're learning from. Just consider that the flat earth society is fake. Taken over by bad guys long ago. Can't share links because this place would just see them get deleted.
You have to figure it out. Actually try. Not just listen to this guy or that. Personally, I find Eric dubays voice annoying, but he is a good writer, he is consise at least. But you have to learn , or relearn things, to stop believing the deception you're in now. It's almost impossible to break the programming, good luck.
Beers law? Do you mean the the Beer-Lambert extinction law? Let's take a look at it.
Nothing in that would effect a light source dropping below the horizon, nor would it explain the light seeming to drop below the horizon if it is really moving away laterally. It almost sounds like you've just accepted this without thinking it through. I'm not trying to be contentious, but your talk about breaking programming falls flat if your explanations don't make sense.
Let's try a different tactic. I'll tell you what I would need to change my mind, and you tell me what you would need to change your mind. For my part, a physical model that accurately accounts moon passes and seasonal cycles would go a very long way toward legitimacy in my mind.
One common way that history is (re)written--although virtually unrecognized by the public and unquestioned by historians--is that "secret histories" are "discovered" long after they were purportedly written. And what do we find for Procopius himself?
So the Vatican only had a thousand years to dream something up? Sounds like it must be legit, but it's still something for everyone to keep in mind as you're trying to figure out just what the hell actually went on.
That first one sounds like it could describe what happened to Wendy Williams.