Catholics, Behold Your "Vicar of Christ"...
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
Is there a Vice-Vicar that God communes with when the pope is busy talking to John after a long weekend?
God differs...from all into each one. Few within suggest commun-ism to tempt many together, as to equalize differences.
Each differ from God who is Unity. Hence the word 'each'.
Many denotes separation from. Words themselves do this as they attempt to conjoin in communion, no?
Oxy-moronic, like the word.....itself.
I chose to discuss rather than argue against with you, because you're always half right.
Word
Unit; noun - "single number regarded as an undivided whole"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/unit#etymonline_v_4515
God implies the dividing whole, with each one within being a divided partial of God.
Unity; noun - "the state of being one; a thing undivided itself, but separate from every other thing"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/unity
Unity implies being within state of separation...not the God that separates beings from one another.
In short...only within whole (unit) can there be separation (unity).
To denote (identify; identic; same) contradicts separation from one another. God doesn't generate many by putting together...God generates each by setting apart.
Holding onto the suggested word "God" aka a suggested denotation/identification, tempts many together, while ignoring the ongoing state of separation.
a) Word implies shaped by letter. One being tempted to LET another shape words into denotations/identifications/definitions etc. implies the already successful attempt to conjoin in communion ones consent and another ones suggestion.
b) Yes vs no reasoning can only exist after one already LET another shape words into denotations to reason about. Whatever side one chooses reconfirms the same conflict aka that which imbalances ones choice against another.
c) A word cannot do...God does sound by separating each instrumental being from one another. Words are then shaped by instrumental beings to trick many to play along few, while ignoring Gods sound.
And once again...GOD implies such a word tempting many to follow few. Holding onto the word "god" tempts one to ignore moving sound.
Letter into words implies a being who freely lets another being bind together.
If one uses FREE will of choice to let another choose for one, then one restricts self. One isn't free because of others...one is FREE (choice) because of DOM (balance), hence not "because", but cause (balance) of being (choice).
This is how an oxymoron can be reverse engineered by using implication (if/then) over reason (vs)...yet, one can only do this by self, not for or from others. If you agree with my statement, then your agreement implies an oxymoron aka another contradiction to your FREE will of choice.
Discuss/discutere - "to shake apart"...as oppose to arguing "against" one another within a conflict of reason.
The issue..."you're always half right" implies 50/50 hindsight from within a conflict of reason (right vs wrong).
There's no "half" of God...only each partial being within whole God aka a perpetual balance of whole/partial for each partials choice within whole balance.
Choosing either "half" within a conflict of reason imbalances ones choice.
a) I can't be "always"...only one being (life) within all way (inception towards death) of God.
b) The suggested word "always" implies both pluralism (ways) and collectivism (all ways)...either of which contradicting separation from one another, and thereby the ONE and only God.