When profit became a goal of human activity, things turn into complete shit quickly.
All that planned obsolence, processed food, single-use things, finacial services and all that stuff is a product of profit-driven economy and nothing else.
And it is only beginning. It's not hard to imagine how that will develop, and picture is disgusting.
Also, profit-driven economy is a power source for aristocracy/elites and inevitably lead to globalism.
In the not so distant past some enterprises/corporations still valued such thing as reputation, and kind of tried to not make shitty things for the sake of profit. However, with development of advertising into brainwashing, even those who careв about reputation completely turned to profits, and you will not find anyone who try to make nice, reliable, long-lasting things for customers.
It is not a technical problem to make a car that will last forever with rare cheap service today. It will not even be expensive. It will generate an excellent reputation, but not much profits. So, it is impossible today.
I don't see any clear solution to that shit, but profit-driven economy have to be exterminated to prevent disaster in the future.
Funny, but that globalists dream of social credit system could be kind of partial solution, if applied to businesses instead of people, by people. Things reliability, cost of ownership, lifetime and other parameters could be used to score corporations. Corporations with low score could be forced to pay compensation to customers, to effectively cut their profits and so force them to choose other goal, like reputation or whatever else.
All advertising, except neutral and real product parameters should be banned forever. Any attempt to use any subconscious methods in advertising shoud be punished as fraud, criminally with jailtime. Say, car manufacturers shouldn't show a car running through pleasant landscape with something like "this car wil make you look cool" voice in background. There should be mpg, hp, trunk volume, cost of year ownership in terms of service costs and spare parts and other really useful information.
Basically, modern advertising is a pure brainwashing today, thats side-effect of profit-driven economy. If you can brainwash people to buy shit, then there is no any need to make decent things at all.
Really this is a huge conspiracy, that combines nearly all shit we have in our clown world, from fiat money everybody run after as stupid sheep to the globalism and jews. And all that combines into one thing - profit-driven economy.
If we want to do something about any of conspiracies we talk about, then we have to start with profit-driven economy.
a) The natural order implies the process which produces (living) through consumption (dying).
b) Previous (inception towards death) consumes following (life).
Ones (singular) consent to suggested pluralism (we) implies that subscription aka self imposed slavery.
Living implies being set apart from one another...not joined together.
Comfort implies "strength together"...natural order sets life apart from one another, which implies that ones builds strength by needing to resist the wanted temptation of joining together.
What's the first thing a rich person does? Separating self from the poor... "rules for thee but not for me"
Balance (inception/death) generates choice (life)..."You better check yourself before you wreck yourself"
All is one in energy aka "one for all and all for one"...money tempts one to hold onto value, while ignoring that energy energizes being within motion, hence value (all perceivable) generating evaluation (ones perception).
Value isn't the issue...misusing ones free will of choice to hold onto any suggested value tempts one to ignore self, hence diminishing ones evaluation of all moving value.
Natural law WAS before one came into being within...suggesting to each other what it IS tempts one to ignore that.
If all implies one in energy, then there cannot be more or less than energy. Energy setting itself apart internally from whole (action) into partials (reaction) implies a setting FREE.
Others suggest a conflict of reason (more vs less) to tempt ones FREE will of choice to earn/urn a living by selling out, while buying into it.
One doesn't need to buy (consent) what another sells (suggestion)...one is tempted to want (more) or not want it (less), while choosing either establishes the conflict against the opposite.
Aka wanting more (suggested) than already offered (perceivable). Nobody within nature can offer more than nature already offers, yet anyone can choose to take each others offers, which ignores natural for artificial.