The World Ahead 2025 5202 daehA dlroW ehT
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (10)
sorted by:
The original:
https://images.ctfassets.net/2h5kbjx7tvqe/0ntHneBgSafiVmrUF4eNg/fca5ade0c2107504eb318cb037170a49/TWA_2025_cover_1280x720.jpg
Year 2024 (published late 2023):
https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1096,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20231118_COP002.jpg
Thank you for sharing the original 2025 cover.
The year of 2024 shows the red and blue dynamic. The Vesica piscis is also a theme in that cover. The vesica piscis is used to merge the polar opposite colors of red and blue. Which form a side ways eye in the overlapping circles.
Red and blue are important psychological constructs as it is the boundaries of visible light.
Red and blue light are used as a means of subconscious control over the human mind. Red and blue when combined make purple.
Many logos and lights are red and blue for a reason. Think about how many sports organizations use red and blue, Police car lights, and political party affiliates. It's used to show polar opposites of a forked system.
More info on Red and Blue light and psychology it plays on us humans:
https://thenarrowgateweb.com/2016/07/25/purple-haze-all-in-my-brain/
What's also interesting to see is the picture of the hurricane. Like they knew there would be massive hurricanes ahead of time. Which only proves that the Rothschilds control and manipulate the weather at their whim.
I enjoy your keen mind fact digger. I hope this information helps.
reposted fixed alignment
Nature doesn't reflect...each one within responses (re) to being bend (flectere). Few suggests mirrors to invert that by tempting many to hold onto the reflection thereof.
Mirror/mirare - "to look at" implies ones sight (perception) within all (perceivable) looking/locking onto what another shows (suggested).
Nature doesn't reflect...
https://thewowstyle.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/reflection_lake_washington-normal.jpg
a) JPG implies a digital compression of an image aka the further manipulation of a captured moment (picture).
Nature implies the ongoing motion generating the MOMENT-um for each temporary perspective within...few suggest many to look at (lock onto) captured moments (pictures) to distort each ones perspective within the momentum of motion.
b) If one stands at lake washington, then ones choice to look at it implies ones response (re) to being bend (flectere) by nature.
In short...nature implies action; each thing within implies reaction. Action cannot reflect...only re-action can re-flect upon action.
c) It's oneself looking/locking onto either the suggested jpg (picture) or as the perceiving sight, which mirrors/mirare - "to look at".
Nature continues to move, while those within look/lock onto things...which bends (flect) ones responses (re).
perhaps the universe only exists for us to observe and name it.
to imply that action cannot reflect is stating the ends without recognizing the means.
JPG, implies J PEG, to peg with a J. (picture) implies pick of nature. Picture rhymes with mature, and aperture. Picture also rhymes with for sure.
Locking implies a pool of water that moves up and down to match water levels of two given water bodies.
Bends a term used by scuba divers to get high af on nitrous oxide. Bends to Bend, to bend girder like bender from Futurerama.
Looking implies observation without action. I looked at the hot waitress while my wife was looking at the menu. The waitress and I locked eyes. My action of looking resulted in me being locked out of the house.
My Bowels continues to move
Per (by) haps (happen; to come by chance)...by implies ones origin, while chance implies ones lack of self discernment as choice (matter) by balance (momentum) of nature (motion).
Putting together PER and HAPS implies suggested spell-craft tempting ones consent to hold it together. This is where choice gets inverted by chance, hence consenting to a suggestion implying a gamble.
Aka uni (one) + verse/vers/wer - "to turn; bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/verse#etymonline_v_4738
Nature implies oneness (motion) turning (momentum) into ones (matter), hence an internal setting apart/separation/differentiation/transformation of whole (all perceivable) into partials (ones perception).
Few utilize suggestion to tempt consenting many together, hence "turning" them against one another within conflicts (versus) of reason.
Therefore it's on oneself to either discern self as verse within uni or ignore it for suggested "universe", which turns one against one another.
Oneness (whole) forwards ones (partials) by setting units apart from one another...few (chosen ones) tempt many together with for example suggested pluralism (us) aka United States aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one).
Once again it's on oneself to discern that UNIT implies apart from one another, while suggested UNITY tempts together.
Energy implies singular...not plural. All implies one in energy. Pluralism implies a fictitious suggestion to distract ones singular perception from all perceivable singularity setting itself apart internally/inherently aka energy.
a) Ob (before) serve/servo (to keep)...a forwarded (inception towards death) being (life) cannot keep anything.
All perceivable moves through ones perception as "inspiration"...others suggest "information" to tempt ones mind/memory to hold onto it. Those who hold onto information are ignoring to draw from; within and in response to inspiration, while permitting others to shape information at will.
b) Motion through momentum into matter implies sound through spectrum into instrument. That's why ones structured mind within sound can specify voice.
Misusing voice to utter artificial words, which tempt others to hold onto definitions (definite; to affix), while branding the moving world around them with "meaning" establishes dissonance within sound.
Words tempt one to ignore ones response (re) to sound (sonance)...
Notice that the picture you posted doesn't show "lake washington"...but a jpg branded "lake washington" for many to share among each other, hence domesticating their memories to associate picture with label. That's idolatry.
a) Implic-ATION aka if/then implies origin (action) and outcome (reaction)...unless ignored by ones reacting choice for another ones chosen suggestion.
b) Cannot aka suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to ignore that everything acts upon one, for one to be enabled to re-act.
Choosing to ignore everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested) implies balance as origin of choice...even when ignored.
c) Responding (re) to being bend (flect) implies ones stance within the visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion) as a ray (matter) bend from one another.
Any suggested "state" tempts one to ignore ones position within all.
d) Mean/medius/medhyo - "middle" implies effect (matter) in the middle (momentum) of cause (motion).
Consenting to a suggested meaning permits those suggesting to "mediate" through "media" as a centralized intelligence agency what happens in-between cause and effect.
e) Suggested "without" tempts ones perception to ignore being "within" all perceivable.
To pick implies to choose from...nature (motion) sets apart (momentum) choices (matter), which only then allows picking.
Nature cannot choose (react)...nature (energy) enacts (balance) reactions (choice). Only inside of balance (inception/death) is choice (life) required for the sustenance of one self among one another.
Nature (motion) nurtures (momentum) natives (matter)...natives wield the free will of choice to ignore nurturing nature for artificial curation by one another. That's how nature allows each unit within to learn/teach self about consequences of choices aka "fuck around; find out".
a) Only while being (life) moved (inception towards death) can one respond to left/right; up/down; front/back position aka balancing as choice.
b) Few suggest "mix and match" to distract from equal nature (inception towards death) differentiating each off-spring within (life) from one another.
c) Oneness (whole) gives ones (partials) temporal access to being a part...chosen ones tempt choosing many into a dual (two) conflict of reason aka a "dual duel" about access to suggested information.
Buying (consent) and selling (suggestion) tempts one (perception) to ignore all given (perceivable). Nature cannot be bought and sold...unless ignored by the majority within for a few merchants of temptation suggesting a trade towards traitors, who willingly sell themselves out.
Aka bending out of shape, which nature orders by forcing balance upon ones choice....hence feeling down after getting high. Few suggest many to mix uppers and downers to keep the imbalance going.
Bender aka bending the rules, which shows robot/robur - "strength"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Roboration
Rama/ramate - "stands still"...https://www.etymonline.com/word/Rama#etymonline_v_3323 Those who watch a bending of rules in the future are pretending to stand still, while ignoring being (life) moved (inception towards death), which diminishes strength.
Choosing to look implies reacting while within enacting input towards ones senses.
Looked/locked aka waitress/wait rest aka rest-aurant aka re-store...all branded to distract from being moved.
Looking implies re-acting to what can be seen, which nature enacts as input through each beings outputting senses.
Few suggest actors under directors to distract from action (motion) directing (momentum) reactions (matter).
Nature continuously moves hunger through the bowels of each temporal being tempted by appetite. Choosing to resist hunger grows strength to the temptation of appetite.
Nature implies the continuous need to let go for those within struggling with the want to hold onto...hence all the bowel re-movement issues aka indigestion.
I thought the ballot box looked a little ice cubey, now I think they also think the future is cold.
Or a symbol of imprisoning the planet from Antarctica
"Stuffing the planet into a box"
Very well could be, prison planet, what a nightmare.