Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

20
Joe Rogan on the moon landing (media.gab.com)
posted 1 year ago by user20461 1 year ago by user20461 +21 / -1
Your browser does not support videos.
57 comments share
57 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (57)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– Hate4_Zetetics 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

The surface doesn't curve, lazy ass.

You just assume you're right, based on your belief and everyone else.

It's sad you won't even try. Giving up thought before even considering it means you fell for the first psy op. Obviously FE is littered with psy op, as you should expect

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

pathetic. Of course.

Tell me FE genius:

  1. Where is the edge of your (pretend, non-existent) Flat Earth? The last answer one of you fools gave me was "The Antarctic Ice Wall". Can you improve in stupidity on that?

  2. Can you go to the top of your (FBI-traitor faggots) building and wave to me? I am at sea-level, so I'll be able to see you

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Hate4_Zetetics 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Look at how programmed you are. You believe I am a flat earther because I said the earth is flat. And to you, any questioning the globe means you are in a cult that believes there is an edge.

You watch too much FE controlled psy op. Good luck figuring it out for yourself, you're fuct.

You don't know what a real flat earther thinks, you just gooble up the CIA fed bullshit from the fake flat earth society, don't be gullible. Check the curve for yourself, what should the curve look like given the slope the earth would need if it really was 24,900 miles around.

Observation shows a flat and stationary earth, only the globe cult thinks it's round even though they cant see it.

I'm sure you're too busy stroking your ego right now to comprehend anything I say.

Answer to question 1. There probably isn't an edge because the idea of a giant sun and huge planets and infinite universe is all institutionalized bullshit.

The land we are standing on might go on for infinity. Because space is a hoax. You don't have the balls to admit that when you look up, you see stars and black, but can't actually know what it is without "believing" in your schooling, you're institutionalized. I was too. But I made fun of a Flat earth one day and he asked me some great questions that I took seriously. He asked me to calculate the curve. And then explain why boats go over the horizon, why I see mountain ranges that should be behind the curve.

All I did, at first, was what you did, assumed he was bat shit crazy.

Sad part, it's easy to see the globe deception once you know how to look, it's in plain sight.

Number 2. You're not understanding how psy ops work. They use information dominance. Like mass media. Fbi doesn't pay a few people to waste their time on a loser website like this

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

There probably isn't an edge because the idea of a giant sun and huge planets and infinite universe is all institutionalized bullshit.

Who? is batshit crazy again.

You believe I am a flat earther because I said the earth is flat.

Who is batshit crazy again?

Observation shows a flat and stationary earth

Who is batshit crazy here?

The land we are standing on might go on for infinity.

(love the "might".) Yeah, infinity dude. You have to bring "(might be) infinity " to support your batshit argument.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Hate4_Zetetics 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Can u handle this or too triggered?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

at least you will get you $1.50 or however much you are paid per post. If the block function worked on this forum then I would never have to see your dishonest, retarded jibberish ever again.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Hate4_Zetetics 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Stop telling yourself this stupid shit. It's weak minded. Don't be a pussy and try to label this shit into some dumb conspiracy that I'm paid to pester you. Or "make this forum look bad". No one comes here, who would pay me to share fringe ideas?

Don't you understand how psy ops work? It's through information dominance. Thousands of 2 cent commenters pushing a narrative. The are on popular websites like reddit. You won't find that here.

Deal with the problem by allowing and trusting yourself to think it through

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Check the curve for yourself, what should the curve look like given the slope the earth would need if it really was 24,900 miles around.

Hmm, ok.

  • distance to centre of earth, R, is 6360km, 6360E3 m, depending where on earth I am
  • My viewing height is 2m, say
  • d is the distance to the horizon, where my line of sight hits the horizon. Note that Flat Earth morons both disbelieve (paid to) and believe (every day observations) the existence of the horizon.

Question: does the calculated 'd' match the observed 'd'

Calculated d

The tangent (my view to the horizon) , which is d, is at right angles to the line of the earth's radius R. That is what a tangent is.

So there is a right-angled triangle:

  • side length R to the centre of the spherical earth (side a)
  • side length d my view to the horizon, length to be solved for (side b)
  • hypotenuse R + my height. (side hyp)

a^2 + b^2 = hyp^2 : Pythagorean theorem

R^2 + d_to_horizon^2 = (R + my height)^2 : stick in our, my variables

R^2 + d_to_horizon^2 = R^2 + 2Rxh + h^2 : expand (a + b)^2 to a^2 +2ab + b^2

d_to_horizon^2 = 2Rxh + h^2 : remove R^2 from both sides

d_to_horizon = sqrt(2Rxh + h^2) : sqrt() of both sides

d_to_horizon = sqrt(2Rxh) : same

d_to_horizon = sqrt(2x 6360,000 x 2) or = sqrt(2 x 6360,000m x 2 + 4m ) : same

d_to_horizon = sqrt(2x6360,000x2)

d_to_horizon = 5044m = 5 km.

Observed d, d_to_horizon

Where I live, on the beach, there is an island about 5 km away. (thanks google maps). The horizon is slightly behind that, when viewed from the beach. I will be generous and say that the observed horizon is 6km (and also that the horizon actually exists).

Next time, maybe today (watch for an update) I will look for the horizon from the sea-line.

anyway, roughly correct:

  • observed horizon 6km,
  • calculated horizon 5km.

Of course.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

for you:

belief:

  • the third bridge across the bosphorus and the Dardanelles bridge and that long bridge in New York
  • curvature added to longitude, lattitude aligned roads

reality:

  • made up FBI-faggot traitor psy-op flat earth.
permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Hate4_Zetetics 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

No, the curvature was not needed for those bridges, or any bridges. Rail roads, Suez canal, doesn't matter. all the same. Same with a snipers, there's no adjustment for corrialis or curve. it's just urban legend that MSM pushes. And you just choose to believe the mainstream. It's not like you have ever even tried to verify anything. Unlike me, and any truth earther knows heliocentric and geocentric model better than you.

Reality is that you don't know what the curvature should look like. Earth is 24900 miles around, do the math. Understand what the slope of the curve should look like, then compare that to what you observe.

You're too institutionalized to even think about it.

Talk to a surveyor, ask them if the curve of earth is ever used, no. It's not. Ask a pilot or middle guidance specialist. They are told to assume the earth is flat and stationary. Why? Because if pilots adjusted elevation to account for curve, they would crash into the ground.

Trust me, determining the earth is flat, for yourself, is an intellectual challenge. You have to apply your knowledge of physics, math, and common sense.

Most people are so programmed, like you, they can't even take it seriously

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– PeneDeMichelleObama 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

No, the curvature was not needed for those bridges, or any bridges

Flat earther lying again (FELA)

snipers, there's no adjustment for corrialis or curve.

FELA

It's not like you have ever even tried to verify anything.

FELA. I lived in the midwest, the earth-aligning curves are real . I live on the planet, and neither I nor you can see the Eiffel Tower.

Trust me,

No one would ever trust you.

Trust me, determining the earth is flat, for yourself, is an intellectual challenge.

"challenge" might not be the correct word,

.

I get it: Compulsive liars with no self respect become flat earthers. Gotta get that FELA

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Hate4_Zetetics 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Bro, you are laughably confused how your eyes work. I don't lie. You're just programmed still, to reject anyone who makes you question the narrative your were raised with.

You call me a liar but you don't actually know if engineering of those bridges used curvature in the construction, you just believe what you're told.

FE is real. We are placed in this place, it's not a planet and the sun is small because space is also a hoax. You can't just see forever, optical perspective and Beers law explain that. It's totally stupid to assume you know FE and then pretending you know better

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy