mental illness mistaking words for reality, the wrapping for the gift.
zero awareness of the fluidity of language and the extent to which words change their meaning over time and are thus labile.
probably a paid distraction system. so much effort . . . and effectively not one single person has taken this account and its mentally ill word association football jibberish seriously. 10 more years of automatically generated bullshit wordplay responses, and still not one single person will take this gibberish seriously.
as far as coding goes, these gpt-based systems are simply awesome.
I tend to use gpt-4o-mini , not even a strong model, and it's coding and problem solving is simply unbelievably awesome.
I will write pages of bullshit code, and its solution will be simple and elegant and much better than what I have written . it's sometimes makes small mistakes, yes, that I find in a debugger or I can see straight away that it's swapped a couple of things around or something.
the only people who think that these systems are not completely awesome ? The people who do not use them.
a) Re-volu-tion (response turning from action)...using artificial implies turning from natural.
b) Ones consent to a suggested artifice implies occur, verb - "to meet in argument"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/occur#etymonline_v_2471 hence reasoning if something is vs is not occurring.
c) The rhetoric "keep telling" tempts one to ignore that a tale is given out by suggestion, while those who consent are keeping it.
Intelligence/intelligo - "to understand" implies ones consent standing under suggested artifice, while ignoring to stand up within nature.
mental illness mistaking words for reality, the wrapping for the gift.
zero awareness of the fluidity of language and the extent to which words change their meaning over time and are thus labile.
probably a paid distraction system. so much effort . . . and effectively not one single person has taken this account and its mentally ill word association football jibberish seriously. 10 more years of automatically generated bullshit wordplay responses, and still not one single person will take this gibberish seriously.
as far as coding goes, these gpt-based systems are simply awesome.
I tend to use gpt-4o-mini , not even a strong model, and it's coding and problem solving is simply unbelievably awesome.
I will write pages of bullshit code, and its solution will be simple and elegant and much better than what I have written . it's sometimes makes small mistakes, yes, that I find in a debugger or I can see straight away that it's swapped a couple of things around or something.
the only people who think that these systems are not completely awesome ? The people who do not use them.
99.9% of the human population.
correct. changing the subject entirely, and correct.
here we go again
an anti gen-AI post from someone who said he has never used one and never will telling me the value I get for $20 a month is not worth it.
It's so good I pay for it myself so that work cannot take it away from me if I leave !!