Alt righters who think we have too much "libertarianism" truly astonish me. The LP is the party who gets the least amount of votes, in a country where the government taxes half our income and regulates the ability to BRAID HAIR legally.
I would never say we should have no social regulation or moral rules enforced. But a move in the direction of a libertarian decentralized USA would be a huge improvement. We could have far less laws, and still enforce the important ones, like public decency. In fact we could do a better job at that enforcement when law enforcement isn't wasting time on so many other things.
Alternatively, you could be Catholic, like me, and believe in the concepts of subsidiarity, solidarity, and corporatism or distributism. Those would solve what you're talking about, without having to appeal to a Judeo-Masonic ideology.
Look I think you Catholics mean well and are usually close to being saved or can actually be saved already (depending). But Martin Luther figured out the Vatican's game a long time ago. He also called out the Jews. So you can't tell me "Protestants are Jew worshipers". The very first one wrote an entire book refuting them.
He also called out the Jews. So you can't tell me "Protestants are jew worshipers".
a) Calling out the jews implies Martin Luther protesting. Protestant implies one who follows by consent those who suggest protestantism in the name of Martin Luther....followers aren't protesting anything.
b) A jew exploits gentile ignorance of the aforementioned in a way more devious way...
PROTEST', verb (Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it) - "to affirm with solemnity; to make a solemn declaration of a fact or opinion; as, I protest to you, I have no knowledge of the transaction"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/protest
Hence to protest implies a transaction between a jew selling (suggestion) and gentiles buying (consent).
c) Martin Luther aka MARS (war) LOOTER...spoils for the takin'...handrubbin' intensifies...
Alt righters who think we have too much "libertarianism" truly astonish me. The LP is the party who gets the least amount of votes, in a country where the government taxes half our income and regulates the ability to BRAID HAIR legally.
I would never say we should have no social regulation or moral rules enforced. But a move in the direction of a libertarian decentralized USA would be a huge improvement. We could have far less laws, and still enforce the important ones, like public decency. In fact we could do a better job at that enforcement when law enforcement isn't wasting time on so many other things.
Alternatively, you could be Catholic, like me, and believe in the concepts of subsidiarity, solidarity, and corporatism or distributism. Those would solve what you're talking about, without having to appeal to a Judeo-Masonic ideology.
Look I think you Catholics mean well and are usually close to being saved or can actually be saved already (depending). But Martin Luther figured out the Vatican's game a long time ago. He also called out the Jews. So you can't tell me "Protestants are Jew worshipers". The very first one wrote an entire book refuting them.
a) Calling out the jews implies Martin Luther protesting. Protestant implies one who follows by consent those who suggest protestantism in the name of Martin Luther....followers aren't protesting anything.
b) A jew exploits gentile ignorance of the aforementioned in a way more devious way...
PROTEST', verb (Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it) - "to affirm with solemnity; to make a solemn declaration of a fact or opinion; as, I protest to you, I have no knowledge of the transaction"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/protest
Hence to protest implies a transaction between a jew selling (suggestion) and gentiles buying (consent).
c) Martin Luther aka MARS (war) LOOTER...spoils for the takin'...handrubbin' intensifies...
what do you mean? martin luther was planted by jews?