a) Can't implies versus can...that's logic/reason/conflict/war.
b) Nature moves sound...few within suggest words to tempt many into consenting to a CALL; verb - "summon, invoke; ask for, demand, order; give a name to, apply by way of designation"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/call
one side is heavily armed and the other is not...it's a slaughter
America is heavily armed...yet being slaughtered without any noticeable resistance from within.
Implication cannot be held onto since it moves, hence implicating the folding within motion (im-plic-ation). Few suggest conservatism (hence the can) to tempt many to ignore being a vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death).
In the beginning there was the word.
a) Only within sound can a word be shaped.
b) Beginning implies be (being) ginnan (to open up) aka inception of being alive, while being moved towards death.
Suggested "in the beginning" inverts perception be (being) within perceivable ginnan (to open up)...
c) THE aka suggested the-ism implies an authority before word...hence sound aka entire aka all aka whole...God. It's ones consent to the suggested word, which authorizes a chosen one to shape words in the name of (in nomine) God.
Consenting to a suggestion implies holding onto words, while ignoring perceivable sound.
Sound is vibration
Sound implies entire...vibration implies a setting apart of action and reactions, hence tion generating vibra/weip - "to turn".
Sound was before vibration comes into being.
vibration means energy
Energy vibrates...meaning tempts those vibrating within energy to hold onto something while pretending to be still.
Meaning/mean/men - "to think"...thought can be corrupted by tempting one to ignore that which moves (perceivable inspiration) for that which one holds onto (suggested information).
Life is able to exist because of the word
Suggested "because" inverts cause (sound) towards being (word)...if one consents to it.
Cause enables being...suggested words tempt being to disable ones choice for a chosen ones suggested meaning attached to a word.
Schumann resonances
Suggested Schumann (singular) resonances (plural) tempts one to ignore RE (ones response) SON (all sound)...energy implies all in one.
Consenting to another ones (schumann) suggested pluralism (resonances) establishes dissonance for one (re) within all (sonance).
What's the implication of echo/reflection among differences (waves) within same (sound)?
the reason for life
Life sustains itself through resonance...reason implies dissonance among life.
You gave up your secret there Willy... That is why you are such a word smith eh....etymonline
a) Smith/smi - "to cut"...hence me cutting apart words shaped together within sound setting apart.
The US called those "wars" when it was clearly sticks and stones vs advanced artillery.
a) Ones (singular) consent to suggested US (plural) aka united states establishes the VS aka VERSUS aka WAR.
b) If "sticks and stones may break my bones...but words shall never hurt me" then why can US make any such CALL?
c) Nature advances...artifice tempts those within nature to stagnate, hence few suggesting artillery/articulum/apere to tempt many to attach consent to suggested artifice.
They call it a war
Those responding to the call are establishing the war aka consent establishing conflicts of reason. IT implies suggested theaters of war by few for many to reason against each other within.
Nature neither establishes imbalance, nor does nature call out those living within. Nature generates balance for each ones free will of choice coming into being within.
We were made to love one another
a) Nature generates units by setting whole apart internally, hence setting each one apart from one another.
b) Few suggest pluralism (we the people) to tempt many together (united states aka US).
c) Few suggest moralism (love or hate) to tempt many together within conflicts of reason (love vs hate)....ones consent to either side establishes the conflict against the other. Both love (want) and hate (not want) tempt one to hold onto, while ignoring the need to let go.
d) To love one another implies one holding onto another, while ignoring that nature set one apart from one another...adding hate to the mix implies holding onto what one loves, while stuck fighting what one hates.
If one targets another, then one fights. If one is targeted, then one is under attack.
a) Can't implies versus can...that's logic/reason/conflict/war.
b) Nature moves sound...few within suggest words to tempt many into consenting to a CALL; verb - "summon, invoke; ask for, demand, order; give a name to, apply by way of designation"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/call
America is heavily armed...yet being slaughtered without any noticeable resistance from within.
Implication cannot be held onto since it moves, hence implicating the folding within motion (im-plic-ation). Few suggest conservatism (hence the can) to tempt many to ignore being a vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death).
a) Only within sound can a word be shaped.
b) Beginning implies be (being) ginnan (to open up) aka inception of being alive, while being moved towards death.
Suggested "in the beginning" inverts perception be (being) within perceivable ginnan (to open up)...
c) THE aka suggested the-ism implies an authority before word...hence sound aka entire aka all aka whole...God. It's ones consent to the suggested word, which authorizes a chosen one to shape words in the name of (in nomine) God.
Consenting to a suggestion implies holding onto words, while ignoring perceivable sound.
Sound implies entire...vibration implies a setting apart of action and reactions, hence tion generating vibra/weip - "to turn".
Sound was before vibration comes into being.
Energy vibrates...meaning tempts those vibrating within energy to hold onto something while pretending to be still.
Meaning/mean/men - "to think"...thought can be corrupted by tempting one to ignore that which moves (perceivable inspiration) for that which one holds onto (suggested information).
Suggested "because" inverts cause (sound) towards being (word)...if one consents to it.
Cause enables being...suggested words tempt being to disable ones choice for a chosen ones suggested meaning attached to a word.
Suggested Schumann (singular) resonances (plural) tempts one to ignore RE (ones response) SON (all sound)...energy implies all in one.
Consenting to another ones (schumann) suggested pluralism (resonances) establishes dissonance for one (re) within all (sonance).
What's the implication of echo/reflection among differences (waves) within same (sound)?
Life sustains itself through resonance...reason implies dissonance among life.
a) Smith/smi - "to cut"...hence me cutting apart words shaped together within sound setting apart.
Bonus...Mr. Burns (rothschild) assistant? Smithers...
b) Etymology aka etymon (actual/real) + logy (logic aka reasoning about fiction)...that's what I try to cut apart.
Rom aka roam/ramian (wandering about) + aræman (arise)...there can be only one fall (inception towards death) for each one rising (life) within.
Empire implies dominion aka rise (free will of choice) during fall (dominance of balance).
Being implies roaming within empirical....others suggest the fall of the roman empire to distract one from discerning self.
IN (life) VASION (inception towards death)...not retreat; no surrender!
From the perspective of a jew... https://genius.com/Bruce-springsteen-no-surrender-lyrics
As suggested to the gentiles... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcThFswcLB0
a) Ones (singular) consent to suggested US (plural) aka united states establishes the VS aka VERSUS aka WAR.
b) If "sticks and stones may break my bones...but words shall never hurt me" then why can US make any such CALL?
c) Nature advances...artifice tempts those within nature to stagnate, hence few suggesting artillery/articulum/apere to tempt many to attach consent to suggested artifice.
Those responding to the call are establishing the war aka consent establishing conflicts of reason. IT implies suggested theaters of war by few for many to reason against each other within.
Nature neither establishes imbalance, nor does nature call out those living within. Nature generates balance for each ones free will of choice coming into being within.
a) Nature generates units by setting whole apart internally, hence setting each one apart from one another.
b) Few suggest pluralism (we the people) to tempt many together (united states aka US).
c) Few suggest moralism (love or hate) to tempt many together within conflicts of reason (love vs hate)....ones consent to either side establishes the conflict against the other. Both love (want) and hate (not want) tempt one to hold onto, while ignoring the need to let go.
d) To love one another implies one holding onto another, while ignoring that nature set one apart from one another...adding hate to the mix implies holding onto what one loves, while stuck fighting what one hates.
What made not/nothing? How could nothing be made?
Yes, quite so.