Animation (inception towards death) implies the boundary for life within to be free from one another.
Few exploit this by tempting many with religion/religio - "to bind anew" into consenting to a suggestion, hence holding onto it aka confining self into a cage.
How else do you explain all
All implies PLAIN for EX-pression of each one. Else/alios/allos - "other" implies ignoring all perceivable for a suggestion by another one.
In other words...seeking explanation forwards, tempts one to ignore expressing self (life) in response to forwarding plane (inception towards death).
One does not need any explanation from another...one needs to discern self as ex within plain, while resisting the temptation to WANT explanations from another.
Asking nature to explain itself is answered by nature offering aka impressing the plain for one to express self.
That implies suggested collectivism aka counting each one life-form together, in the name of "all" + suggested the-ism to establish an authority over the ones consenting.
In perceivable reality...all implies flow; each one within implies form.
Putting together each one matter cannot establish all motion, because motion generates momentum, which continuously separates matter.
Try using implication (if/then) on any single sentence, while resisting reason (true vs false; good vs bad; belief vs disbelief etc.). The more you do; the easier it becomes to resist, and the more you'll see what's implied.
Notice that while you're commenting the upvote vs downvote conflict of reason is tempting participation...it's ones free will of choice to resist that temptation.
a) zoo/zoion/zion...
b) Zoo (animal) Bio (life). Few suggest zoology and biology to distract many from living within animation.
Animation (inception towards death) implies the boundary for life within to be free from one another.
Few exploit this by tempting many with religion/religio - "to bind anew" into consenting to a suggestion, hence holding onto it aka confining self into a cage.
All implies PLAIN for EX-pression of each one. Else/alios/allos - "other" implies ignoring all perceivable for a suggestion by another one.
In other words...seeking explanation forwards, tempts one to ignore expressing self (life) in response to forwarding plane (inception towards death).
One does not need any explanation from another...one needs to discern self as ex within plain, while resisting the temptation to WANT explanations from another.
Asking nature to explain itself is answered by nature offering aka impressing the plain for one to express self.
Impression (motion) plain (momentum) expression (matter)...
That implies suggested collectivism aka counting each one life-form together, in the name of "all" + suggested the-ism to establish an authority over the ones consenting.
In perceivable reality...all implies flow; each one within implies form.
Putting together each one matter cannot establish all motion, because motion generates momentum, which continuously separates matter.
Try using implication (if/then) on any single sentence, while resisting reason (true vs false; good vs bad; belief vs disbelief etc.). The more you do; the easier it becomes to resist, and the more you'll see what's implied.
Notice that while you're commenting the upvote vs downvote conflict of reason is tempting participation...it's ones free will of choice to resist that temptation.
Feels more like rat utopia to me.