I saw this at the gateway pundit and supposedly it only applied to people who had their licenses from back in 1996 or earlier.
Evidence of poor voter registration database management, failure to adapt data and systems in software updates or database system upgrades, over reliance on old data that is not audited nor integrity checked with more recent data such as census data or public property records, etc.
Not sure if it is proof of anything nefarious or deliberate. This is misdirection from real election fraud. This is likely a planted story about a huge NOTHING BURGER to hide and bury REAL stories about election fraud.
Note: Not a complete nothing burger since it is evidence of outdated and possibly inaccurate voter registration databases. But certainly seems like misdirection from bigger stories about more nefarious or deliberate examples of electioneering and election fraud and meddling in the makeup of demographics, election engineering, etc.
I see the roughly 100,000 unverifiable voters as "padding" to allow a cheating insider to stuff enough ballots into the system to flip the state while still falling within the number of registered voters.
You will be able to see if they have done this if the election result falls far outisde the margins of error in the most recent regional polls. This is especially true for exit polls, as international obsevers consider even a 2% deviation to be an irregularity.
If memory serves, the discrepancy between exit polling in Arizona during the Democratic primary between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders was a whopping 12% in favor of Clinton, at which point they stopped doing exit polling altogether. I am convinced they cheated like hell over there.
EDIT: The polls appear rigged this election cycle, and that's to keep them more in line with the fraudulent results should there be an opportunity for cheating.
Good argument and point. The more inflated the voter registration rolls are, the more padding and fake phantom votes they can work with. Valid argument.
I saw this at the gateway pundit and supposedly it only applied to people who had their licenses from back in 1996 or earlier.
Evidence of poor voter registration database management, failure to adapt data and systems in software updates or database system upgrades, over reliance on old data that is not audited nor integrity checked with more recent data such as census data or public property records, etc.
Not sure if it is proof of anything nefarious or deliberate. This is misdirection from real election fraud. This is likely a planted story about a huge NOTHING BURGER to hide and bury REAL stories about election fraud.
Note: Not a complete nothing burger since it is evidence of outdated and possibly inaccurate voter registration databases. But certainly seems like misdirection from bigger stories about more nefarious or deliberate examples of electioneering and election fraud and meddling in the makeup of demographics, election engineering, etc.
I see the roughly 100,000 unverifiable voters as "padding" to allow a cheating insider to stuff enough ballots into the system to flip the state while still falling within the number of registered voters.
You will be able to see if they have done this if the election result falls far outisde the margins of error in the most recent regional polls. This is especially true for exit polls, as international obsevers consider even a 2% deviation to be an irregularity.
If memory serves, the discrepancy between exit polling in Arizona during the Democratic primary between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders was a whopping 12% in favor of Clinton, at which point they stopped doing exit polling altogether. I am convinced they cheated like hell over there.
EDIT: The polls appear rigged this election cycle, and that's to keep them more in line with the fraudulent results should there be an opportunity for cheating.
Good argument and point. The more inflated the voter registration rolls are, the more padding and fake phantom votes they can work with. Valid argument.