A tought popped into my head. How are time machines powered? Wouldn't there have to be a power source on the other end of the funnel, tunnel, or crack in the time continuum? It it powered by a 18th century water wheel hooked to a primitave battery or to a nuclear reactor? Plus, once you manufacture your time machine, how would you plug it into the power source? 110v or 220v or 1MV? Someone will probably say time travel is all a state of mind. This makes me wonder how Q knows about things years in advance. Either he has a time travel machine OR he is within the deep state and is leading them to do certain things. Q has a finger in a lot of future happenings so his spies must be very busy at the moment. Wouldn't it be interesting to read the book once all the dust settles. This has always been a military operation, lots of brainiacs because one man cannot have they type of mental capacity. Q is just the mouthpiece, others are doing the heavy lifting. Q has said that there are only ten folks who know the complete picture of the MAGA program, so it must be eight US generals and two civilians, on of which is Trump. I bet Scavino is the other.
What say you guys?
By ones consent to the suggestion thereof...without ones consent a suggested "time machine" couldn't even reach ones mind.
Energy...how else could power be sustained?
Machine; noun (Latin machina) - "artificial work"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/machine aka an artificial suggestion shaped within perceivable nature.
Based on suggested information invited by your consent into your head like "from time to time" (14c) or "the times" (1590) or "time after time" (1630) or "to be ahead of ones time" (1837) or "time and again" (1864) or "time machine" (1895) etc.
How about changing the sentence to "According to a suggestion by TIME magazine and H.G. Wells I believe that a thought popped into my head about time machines"?
Being implies a power within a source. Only within a source can there be power differentiation aka an out-sourcing of potential within source.
Ones beginning (inception); ones being (life); ones end (death)...there cannot be another end. Few suggest progressivism to tempt many seek other ends, while ignoring the only perceivable origin moving one to the only outcome of being.
Continuous (inception towards death) generates temporal (life)...few suggest time (past; present and future) to tempt many to believe in temporal continuation by escaping.
A being can only perceive "now"...not before or after, which are suggested as a duration of time to distract being from now, which is why many ignore perceivable now by asking questions (a quest towards end), while waiting for answers afterwards, which implies life waiting for outcome aka for death.
Few offer artifice (information) to question, while industrializing and shaping the answers given so that many continue to ask for answers...it's just like feeding cattle.
Instead of thinking in terms of "duration"; try discerning self as being presence (life) within duration (inception towards death) with the free will of choice to increase or decrease being...only then can duration be freely traveled aka ones free will of choice on the journey of life.
Few suggest time to invert durability (life) with duration (inception towards death), hence tempting life to focus on death, when watching time running out...
All implies motion; mind implies matter within momentum of motion, hence being enabled to memorize input.
State/status - "be firm" implies being formed (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka one within all.