One's own mind cannot be shared universally with a community. One's mind contains secrets, lies, misperceptions, misunderstandings. One cannot see into another person's mind.
Therefore, no such thing as a public mindset exists. Especially in a "diverse" "multi-cultural" region in which divisions allow one to divide and conquer.
jews must face inception toward their expedited deaths. Impaling jews yields inception toward life and prosperity for superior Whites.
a) Community aka one (unit) together (com) contradicts being apart from one another as units (partials) within all (whole).
b) Public (plural) implies private (singular)...private (one) can be tempted with suggested pluralism (we) to ignore self for others.
c) Both public and community imply aggregation of private...meanwhile "implication" (if/then) implies a setting apart aka a privatization.
mindset implies cognitive disposition
The position of ones perceiving (cognitive) mind implies at the center of all perceivable. Dis-position implies ones position set apart from one another, while within all.
Dis-position can be utilized to distract ones cognitive perception from all perceivable with the suggestions of other ones...chosen ones.
The opposite of cognitive (perception) implies corporeal (suggestion) and few utilize corpus oration (corporation) to tempt many to ignore cognitive reality (perceivable sound) for corporeal fiction (suggested words).
A jew operates cognitive, while shaping corporeal suggestions for consenting gentiles...that's spell-craft; magic; masonry etc.
One's own mind cannot be shared universally
a) Oneness (whole) cannot be owned by ones (partials) within...potential cannot be possessed since it moves, only expressed as growth (life) during impressing loss (inception towards death).
The cognitive (inspiration) cannot be held onto, while the corporeal (information) tempts one to hold onto it; take possession of it; own it...by consenting to the suggestion of it.
That's where ones mind/memory gets misused as storage of information (hard-drive) instead for processing of inspiration (ram).
b) Sharing isn't consenting (buy) to suggestion (sell)...it's being partial (perception) within whole (perceivable) set free (will of choice) from one another.
A jew suggesting corporeal to cut off a consenting gentiles cognition implies a share-cropper...
c) Universe implies verse/vertere/wer - "to turn" aka turning one against another within conflicts of reason...which tempts one to ignore being (life) directed linear (inception towards death).
Reasoning implies "circular" logic based on ones consent to suggested logos (words)...that's the turn/tere - "to rub" aka those set free from one another rubbing against each other within conflicts of reason.
One's mind contains...
...whatever suggested information one consented to hold (tenere) together (con), while ignoring perceivable inspiration moving through.
One cannot see into another person's mind.
a) NOT was suggested by another person as nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing), for which ones consent de-nials perceivable.
b) Person aka per sonos (by sound) aka sound/sonos/sanus - "entire; whole" implies everything...few suggest nothing as the inversion thereof.
Nothing requires ones consent; everything forces ones adaptation...with or without consent.
no such thing as a public mindset exists
By private consent NO was set into a public mind. Many believing NO implies each one saying YES to the suggestion thereof.
A jewish suggestion becomes the public mind by gentile consent. Suggested information implies public mind; perceiving inspiration implies private mind.
To set implies putting into a definite/affixed place...mind/memory implies a response to a process within motion.
Imperium implies all balance; res privatus implies ones choice; res publica implies following the choices of another.
Empire implies same; private implies different; public implies alike.
If a private one believes in a "like empire", then one has been aggregated by another into a public mindset.
public implies community
mindset implies cognitive disposition
One's own mind cannot be shared universally with a community. One's mind contains secrets, lies, misperceptions, misunderstandings. One cannot see into another person's mind.
Therefore, no such thing as a public mindset exists. Especially in a "diverse" "multi-cultural" region in which divisions allow one to divide and conquer.
jews must face inception toward their expedited deaths. Impaling jews yields inception toward life and prosperity for superior Whites.
a) Community aka one (unit) together (com) contradicts being apart from one another as units (partials) within all (whole).
b) Public (plural) implies private (singular)...private (one) can be tempted with suggested pluralism (we) to ignore self for others.
c) Both public and community imply aggregation of private...meanwhile "implication" (if/then) implies a setting apart aka a privatization.
The position of ones perceiving (cognitive) mind implies at the center of all perceivable. Dis-position implies ones position set apart from one another, while within all.
Dis-position can be utilized to distract ones cognitive perception from all perceivable with the suggestions of other ones...chosen ones.
The opposite of cognitive (perception) implies corporeal (suggestion) and few utilize corpus oration (corporation) to tempt many to ignore cognitive reality (perceivable sound) for corporeal fiction (suggested words).
A jew operates cognitive, while shaping corporeal suggestions for consenting gentiles...that's spell-craft; magic; masonry etc.
a) Oneness (whole) cannot be owned by ones (partials) within...potential cannot be possessed since it moves, only expressed as growth (life) during impressing loss (inception towards death).
The cognitive (inspiration) cannot be held onto, while the corporeal (information) tempts one to hold onto it; take possession of it; own it...by consenting to the suggestion of it.
That's where ones mind/memory gets misused as storage of information (hard-drive) instead for processing of inspiration (ram).
b) Sharing isn't consenting (buy) to suggestion (sell)...it's being partial (perception) within whole (perceivable) set free (will of choice) from one another.
A jew suggesting corporeal to cut off a consenting gentiles cognition implies a share-cropper...
c) Universe implies verse/vertere/wer - "to turn" aka turning one against another within conflicts of reason...which tempts one to ignore being (life) directed linear (inception towards death).
Reasoning implies "circular" logic based on ones consent to suggested logos (words)...that's the turn/tere - "to rub" aka those set free from one another rubbing against each other within conflicts of reason.
...whatever suggested information one consented to hold (tenere) together (con), while ignoring perceivable inspiration moving through.
a) NOT was suggested by another person as nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing), for which ones consent de-nials perceivable.
b) Person aka per sonos (by sound) aka sound/sonos/sanus - "entire; whole" implies everything...few suggest nothing as the inversion thereof.
c) Can/gno - "to know"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/can#etymonline_v_645 implies each ones cognitive response-ability...while "can not" implies a suggested corporeal inversion thereof.
Nothing requires ones consent; everything forces ones adaptation...with or without consent.
By private consent NO was set into a public mind. Many believing NO implies each one saying YES to the suggestion thereof.
A jewish suggestion becomes the public mind by gentile consent. Suggested information implies public mind; perceiving inspiration implies private mind.
To set implies putting into a definite/affixed place...mind/memory implies a response to a process within motion.