Recognizing patterns is just the first step. Figuring out why they are happening is the next step. If multiple theses can explain the patterns, then one must use more than pattern recognition alone to determine what thesis explains the pattern the best.
Yeah, I don't think that's the case
Denigrating pattern recognition on a conspiracy board is a weird method of interaction
Recognizing patterns is just the first step. Figuring out why they are happening is the next step. If multiple theses can explain the patterns, then one must use more than pattern recognition alone to determine what thesis explains the pattern the best.
A cross .win fanclub that seem to all act at the same time doesn't seem so likely, but this isn't a good faith conversation so shrug