Your argument is really foolish - the alternative is to fund the company via advertising and be-beholden to corporate censorship influences. How well did that turn out?
I concur with Andrew that they only way to sustain free-independent speech is to pay for it. You have to put your money where your values are.
Your argument is really foolish - the alternative is to fund the company via advertising and be-beholden to corporate censorship influences. How well did that turn out?
I concur with Andrew that they only way to sustain free-independent speech is to pay for it. You have to put your money where your values are.
The argument says there is ads.