"I believe a Catholic site" - said no one.
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
That statement is correct. So your point is what.
Be careful in your response; don’t claim things about me you don’t know.
Chances are he has you blocked from an earlier argument. Especially if he hasn't downvoted you yet. If I were at home, I'd link the precise one that I'm thinking of... it was the one where he kept accusing you of being "insulting" despite having used 0 insults. He did the exact same thing with me awhile back. All because I asked him to explain in what way a jewish cartoon from 20 years ago relates to the present day situation (he claimed a specific episode "predicts" Kamala being president), something he completely refused to do... oh and look, it's the same cartoon in this image! Does he have an obsession with that show or something?
Oh, slander. Interesting tactic.
However, you REFUSED to watch the video that explained the situation. :(
Nice way to paint me in bad light tho, that's a good touch. New stuff for me.
HAHAHA! Are you kidding? u/tallestskil gets responses only from bots and shills. EVERYONE IN HERE HAS BLOCKED HIM. Everyone, who is not a shill ofc.
He got muted for making death threats like "go k*ll yourself" to anyone in the comments.
You are not fooling anyone who remembers this online rage troll.
Slander doesn't really work in a forum with many researchers that will actually check the facts.
No Insults?
"Eat shit and die" - by u/tallestskil - https://conspiracies.win/p/17tebsldqu/x/c/4ZCckwpxBMR
"Roast in hell, you illiterate pile of shit" - by u/tallestskil - https://conspiracies.win/p/17teEPBzsn/x/c/4ZCbVtk3PuM
"Go away, dipshit" - by u/tallestskil - https://conspiracies.win/p/17tLAzWJVM/x/c/4ZCbClaJaM6
No insults? Really?
Who are you trying to lie to exactly?
Didn’t happen. Cry, coward.
Oh, so you admit you run these?
Thanks for admitting you have no evidence for your claims.
No, subhuman. Not anyone. Just people who refuse to provide any evidence for their claims and expect us to take them seriously.
Right. So stop slandering me for checking your facts.
Thanks for absolving me of the “crimes” you claimed I committed!
Your disagreement with objective facts proves the following:
You have nothing, you pathetic coward. I’m glad you’ve blocked me. It means you won’t fill up comment sections with endless paid shilling in response to my POSTS THAT EXPOSE YOUR HOAXES AS LIES, and you won’t even see that you’re being humiliated.
Still, I find it sad. "I literally cannot handle truth being shown to me, therefore I will block you so I never have to see it again" and then immediately going on to proclaim himself as a researcher dedicated to the truth, without a shred of irony or self-awareness.
This very thread proves what I said about him earlier, that he's stuck in mental trap of contextualizing reality through the lens of jewish media. Why else would he be regurgitating mainstream media propaganda regarding alleged sexual abuse in the church, which has always been jewish projection in the first place. And again, the strange emotional attachment to The Simpsons.
Yeah, nobody is talking to you.
Literally no.
What explanation. You only said "go watch this episode of a jewish cartoon lol" and left it at that. You refused to elaborate when pressed for an explanation as to how the episode applied to reality. "Oy vey, you can't expect me to actually articulate my position! You're the lazy one, not me!"
Emoticons are for women.
If truth paints you in a bad light...
You're not everyone. Nice solipsism, though.
Telling paid shills to commit suicide isn't a threat. Do you even know what "threat" means?
Yeah, slander doesn't work in a forum because "slander" doesn't apply to the written word at all. Holy crap. You esteem yourself as a """researcher""" yet you apparently possess a tenuous grasp of the English language. Why don't you go research a dictionary.
You've already established that reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, so I'll elaborate by saying that I meant that he used no insults in the context of the argument to which I was referring. Which is this one, right here:
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/17te50i0mM/this-forum-exists-from-2020-at-l/c/4ZCatFzHiUT
You kept claiming in this thread that he was throwing "petty" and "baseless" """insults""", but umm... I'm not seeing them here.