Wikipedia doesn't work like that for anything of political importance. The accounts are all fronts. It's not like some rando can just decide what will remain in articles about the Clintons.
Why was the entire section on Clinton's association with Epstein scrubbed? 47.189.235.251 (talk) 19:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
It wasn't. If you check the changelog, it was moved to another article detailing Clinton's post presidential time, which is linked from this article. Now that someone reinserted the Epstein section here, it has become redundant. 2A00:6020:4924:F800:A161:FA10:80E1:CD9A (talk) 06:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
At first I thought maybe they moved it but nope it was removed.
After a bit of digging this is who did it
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bill_Clinton&diff=prev&oldid=1236064272
Wikipedia doesn't work like that for anything of political importance. The accounts are all fronts. It's not like some rando can just decide what will remain in articles about the Clintons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bill_Clinton
This is what they say but always worth keeping your eyes open.
Moving inconvenient information to other Wikipedia articles that don't get views is an old tactic.