I mean, you don't see it? What a joke it is, anybody with eyes to see or ears to hear can spot this and see through the charade. So fake. It's like the blind leading the blind.
If you don't come to the same conclusion I do about [this topic], you're either retarded or deluded or a shill or something. There are no other options. Zero. Everybody who doesn't see things the way I do, must be coming from a position of bad faith.
Let's be real - positions and worldviews are not created equal. Some are retarded and it's evident by blatant contradictions and circularity.
It's more of a continuum than a clear bright line between a retarded worldview and a reasonable one.
I attack the presuppositions of a worldview and expose the contradictions. I'd say logic is pretty straightforward at that stage. Sure, once you get into the details the line drastically blurs and that's the mistake people do when debating socio-political or ethical problems.
They should go for the presupposed starting points (metaphysical and epistemological) in the opponent's worldview (transcendental argumentation) and not bother with normative arguments normies love to prattle endlessly about.