I've been following this for almost three years now.

I have watched hundreds of hours of videos, incl. bright field and dark field microscopy.

Not in a single one have I seen irrefutable evidence of teslaphoresis, self-assembling nano-circuits or functional nanotechnology.

And I keep reminding myself that the definition of nanotech/-circuits is between 1 to 100 nm in size.

The best of available standard optical resolution microscopes (costing hundreds of thousands, and NONE of which were used during the aforementioned videos I've viewed) can only resolve a single element down to 200 nm. The microscopes used so far by the nanobot claiming tubers are much worse.

I've seen zero functional demonstrations of electrical or electromagnetic properties of claimed nanocircuits in the jabs.

So, still after 3 years: lots of claims, the theory is there in the papers (yes, I have most of them downloaded), but so far zero proof in the wild.

This issue could be settled by taking the claimed nanostuff to actual super-resolution microscopes (can resolve down below 100nm) or even better MINFLUX-microscopy.

And giving the samples to proper electronics/EMF/RF testers who would test the claimed circuits for functionality.

But no, none of these talking heads with no training in basic microscopy bother to do it. They just keep piling up on their own narratives with zero falsification and no actual proof.

SO that is why it is very difficult to take their 1000x DF microscopy videos of imaged sodium and cholesterol clumps in gas bubble very seriously.