Would be nice if the ones publicizing the study wasn't Stew Peters affiliated. But the study itself doesn't appear to be from them necessarily.
In that "Final Days" film they focus a lot on Karen Kingston who pushes a lot of disinfo regarding patents. I've looked at the patents she mentions and she goes from truth to off the wall nonsense in her explanations of them. At 48:38 she claims that the sheet of graphene the sample sits on creates "new ionic bonds" that then create "millions of spike protein". She smirks as she says this because anyone with a working knowledge of chemistry knows that isn't a thing. https://rumble.com/v2r004k-final-days-worldwide-premiere.html
She knows that graphene is part of an analytical method being used on a sample and not used to generate anything.
However, all that being said, they could put out disinfo about GO (Graphene Oxide) only to debunk it, all the while actually using it. But if they've debunked it they've primed the minds of the masses to reject it as a "boy who cried wolf" technique.
Or perhaps it is a red herring as they use other materials which aren't being discussed.
Isn't there a spinning centrifuge capable of separating all the components of a substance and then reverse engineering it into the isolated ingredient components? First separate the components/ingredients in the vaccine and figure out what it is made of. Then study how it reacts in different blood types and apply variables.
Maybe such a thing exists. But IIRC in general centrifugation is too crude of a separation technique for nano materials. For instance they aren't able to separate viruses from a cell culture using centrifugation, at least so I was taught.
I'm looking at the paper, it says they are seeing structures forming which range from from 1 to 100 µm which can be seen under microscope. Their best bet would be to first look at their shape and size distribution to figure out a way to separate one from another mechanically. If all the sizes are all over the place then that's not great.
They don't know the chemical properties of these materials which could be used for a chemical separation method. Binding the material out somehow. Though a nano tech specialist could be brought in to guess about the composition of material based on known forms.
I think the play would be to allow one of those structures to grow large enough to physically isolate / drag it around using some super fine instrumentation for small materials. Perhaps the electrostatic attraction of a STM needle could drag it away from other materials or pin it down while everything else is washed away. Then send the material through a very sensitive instrument for elemental analysis.
Once you know it's constituent elements that's a good starting point. It could indicate if it is a more metallic structure, graphene based, protein, synthetic polymer, etc. Then you could perform a more specific analysis from there on a new sample with the same type of structure (or just grow the original molecule so large that you can cut it into pieces).
Would be nice if the ones publicizing the study wasn't Stew Peters affiliated. But the study itself doesn't appear to be from them necessarily.
In that "Final Days" film they focus a lot on Karen Kingston who pushes a lot of disinfo regarding patents. I've looked at the patents she mentions and she goes from truth to off the wall nonsense in her explanations of them. At 48:38 she claims that the sheet of graphene the sample sits on creates "new ionic bonds" that then create "millions of spike protein". She smirks as she says this because anyone with a working knowledge of chemistry knows that isn't a thing. https://rumble.com/v2r004k-final-days-worldwide-premiere.html
She knows that graphene is part of an analytical method being used on a sample and not used to generate anything.
However, all that being said, they could put out disinfo about GO (Graphene Oxide) only to debunk it, all the while actually using it. But if they've debunked it they've primed the minds of the masses to reject it as a "boy who cried wolf" technique.
Or perhaps it is a red herring as they use other materials which aren't being discussed.
Isn't there a spinning centrifuge capable of separating all the components of a substance and then reverse engineering it into the isolated ingredient components? First separate the components/ingredients in the vaccine and figure out what it is made of. Then study how it reacts in different blood types and apply variables.
Maybe such a thing exists. But IIRC in general centrifugation is too crude of a separation technique for nano materials. For instance they aren't able to separate viruses from a cell culture using centrifugation, at least so I was taught.
I'm looking at the paper, it says they are seeing structures forming which range from from 1 to 100 µm which can be seen under microscope. Their best bet would be to first look at their shape and size distribution to figure out a way to separate one from another mechanically. If all the sizes are all over the place then that's not great.
They don't know the chemical properties of these materials which could be used for a chemical separation method. Binding the material out somehow. Though a nano tech specialist could be brought in to guess about the composition of material based on known forms.
I think the play would be to allow one of those structures to grow large enough to physically isolate / drag it around using some super fine instrumentation for small materials. Perhaps the electrostatic attraction of a STM needle could drag it away from other materials or pin it down while everything else is washed away. Then send the material through a very sensitive instrument for elemental analysis.
Once you know it's constituent elements that's a good starting point. It could indicate if it is a more metallic structure, graphene based, protein, synthetic polymer, etc. Then you could perform a more specific analysis from there on a new sample with the same type of structure (or just grow the original molecule so large that you can cut it into pieces).