Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

3
"And it was pressurized, so that the film never saw vacuum" How come spy satellite film can't see vacuum, but the film used by Apollo astronauts in their Hasselblads can? FAKE AND GAY (youtu.be)
posted 1 year ago by MOCKxTHExCROSS 1 year ago by MOCKxTHExCROSS +4 / -1
9 comments share
9 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– freedomlogic 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I had to read about it and I think they are right. The spy sattelite was meant to cover large chunks of the earth so it needed to roll at super high speeds. It wouldnt have been able to ride on pockets of air, if there was no air since there is none in space or not very much at the edge of the atmosphere.

It proably helped keep the film intact when the pods were jettisoned.

Blows my mind they were able to snag these things mid air before they even touched ground, they deploy a parachute of course but they must have had some good accuracy with the system.

Looking at the cameras they used on the moon, they were just regular cameras that had some slight modifications to it. I guess lack of atmosphere or the vacuum of space wouldnt really affect the polarization of light.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MOCKxTHExCROSS [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

This is literally the guy who designed the camera. He says the film was pressurized so it wasn't exposed to vacuum.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy