Here it is from fraud for some reason bcz car titles are being scammed regularly where then LEO can't tell when they run it thru computers? Or people are printing them and showing insurance to register some one elses?
No.. this is about digitizing you and getting paid quicker by digital transfers
Meh, blockchain works to create records or ownership that are hard to forge. It doesn't work for money because individual transactions are too expensive to use it for small daily purchases. Bitcoin et al are a bubble because there're no actual value in "money" that's too expensive to spend.
For something like this, where the record will rarely change hands, it makes sense. I've advocate, for years, using blockchain to implement intellectual "property". Instead of a Steam key, you'd buy a token representing ownership of the game. The publisher pays hosts (Steam, Epic, whoever) to host the actual files for download to whoever has a valid token. You could also use it to verify online play and virtually eradicate piracy, but it would also be impossible to eliminate the second hand market.
It's important not to lose the forest for the trees. Blockchain is not the threat, the threat is getting rid of our ability to engage with each other without government intervention. This actually removes the requirement for government as transfers of ownership could be done without requiring any record keeping on their end, so long as the token is decentralized.
It is a mathematical illusion given to suit a narrative of coding that is neither new or innovative or secure. The problem with every thing today in every aspect of technology is software engineers are creating the 2D illusion of the future when the mechanical world has not changed.
Technology could not be good or evil. Those who use it for good or evil are good or evil.
Blockchain is just a technology. It allows to create a list of verifiable records. The question is who is allowed to add records to that list. If it is everybody, like with BTC, then it allows to get rid of some third-party parasites like banks, lawyers, state, whatever. If only licensed entities allowed to add records to that list, then it is CBDC or whatever nigtmare is hyped around today. Same with license plates. If everybody could add records to that list, then people could sell and buy cars without state agencies intervetion so blockchain become an instrument of independence. If only state could add records to the list, then it is an instrument of control.
It is exactly like internet. Difference is only in who is allowed to rise a site. If it is everybody, then I can't see everything inherently bad in that. If it is only state or corporations, then it is not any different from TV or other MSM.
Blockchain is nothing more than a tech. You are free to use it for whatever thing you want. And it is only one who use it responsible for goodness or evilness of result.
Technology is the simplification of things. By its very existence we then have means to ease the suffering of labor, that which cultivates wisdom, experience, and earnest values.
Just by it existing it poisons the minds of those who "use" it.
And blockchain does not exist. It is a larp no different than when a new framework is released or new code, so as to call it innovative, but it is really just a different sequence of events to arrive at the same destination.
You are likely more interested in mathematics than mechanical and the thing you need to humble yourself to is that mathematics can be spun to suit any variable of definitions -- but every thing in the material world only fits in to a set boundary.
Blockchain is a lie mathematicians told the world to create the illusion of security while in reality it is just another layer of the same sandwich made by the people who own the restaurant.
Just by it existing it poisons the minds of those who "use" it.
If a tool could poison someone's mind, then such mind deserves everything happens with it.
mathematics can be spun to suit any variable of definitions -- but every thing in the material world only fits in to a set boundary.
Math is just a language for describing reality. No less, no more. It's not material world sets boundaries, it is mathematicians just "spoke" things wrong.
It is really a huge problem in modern science, when math excersises was set higher than real experimentation and studies. (happened around 1970, when the stream of amasing inventions and discoveries suddenly completely dried out) This is completely wrong and evil approach, and it is strange for me that you projecting the same thing in your statement.
Remember, the sell is always about to "save us"
Here it is from fraud for some reason bcz car titles are being scammed regularly where then LEO can't tell when they run it thru computers? Or people are printing them and showing insurance to register some one elses?
No.. this is about digitizing you and getting paid quicker by digital transfers
You have a typo there, it's not "save us", it's "ENsLave US"
Hegelian Dialectic. Problem > Reaction > Solution.
Meh, blockchain works to create records or ownership that are hard to forge. It doesn't work for money because individual transactions are too expensive to use it for small daily purchases. Bitcoin et al are a bubble because there're no actual value in "money" that's too expensive to spend.
For something like this, where the record will rarely change hands, it makes sense. I've advocate, for years, using blockchain to implement intellectual "property". Instead of a Steam key, you'd buy a token representing ownership of the game. The publisher pays hosts (Steam, Epic, whoever) to host the actual files for download to whoever has a valid token. You could also use it to verify online play and virtually eradicate piracy, but it would also be impossible to eliminate the second hand market.
It's important not to lose the forest for the trees. Blockchain is not the threat, the threat is getting rid of our ability to engage with each other without government intervention. This actually removes the requirement for government as transfers of ownership could be done without requiring any record keeping on their end, so long as the token is decentralized.
Blockchain does not exist.
It is a mathematical illusion given to suit a narrative of coding that is neither new or innovative or secure. The problem with every thing today in every aspect of technology is software engineers are creating the 2D illusion of the future when the mechanical world has not changed.
There are limitations to digital information.
Blockchain does not exist.
You somehow still miss the point.
Technology could not be good or evil. Those who use it for good or evil are good or evil.
Blockchain is just a technology. It allows to create a list of verifiable records. The question is who is allowed to add records to that list. If it is everybody, like with BTC, then it allows to get rid of some third-party parasites like banks, lawyers, state, whatever. If only licensed entities allowed to add records to that list, then it is CBDC or whatever nigtmare is hyped around today. Same with license plates. If everybody could add records to that list, then people could sell and buy cars without state agencies intervetion so blockchain become an instrument of independence. If only state could add records to the list, then it is an instrument of control.
It is exactly like internet. Difference is only in who is allowed to rise a site. If it is everybody, then I can't see everything inherently bad in that. If it is only state or corporations, then it is not any different from TV or other MSM.
Blockchain is nothing more than a tech. You are free to use it for whatever thing you want. And it is only one who use it responsible for goodness or evilness of result.
Disagree.
Technology is the simplification of things. By its very existence we then have means to ease the suffering of labor, that which cultivates wisdom, experience, and earnest values.
Just by it existing it poisons the minds of those who "use" it.
And blockchain does not exist. It is a larp no different than when a new framework is released or new code, so as to call it innovative, but it is really just a different sequence of events to arrive at the same destination.
You are likely more interested in mathematics than mechanical and the thing you need to humble yourself to is that mathematics can be spun to suit any variable of definitions -- but every thing in the material world only fits in to a set boundary.
Blockchain is a lie mathematicians told the world to create the illusion of security while in reality it is just another layer of the same sandwich made by the people who own the restaurant.
Technology makes weak men.
If a tool could poison someone's mind, then such mind deserves everything happens with it.
Math is just a language for describing reality. No less, no more. It's not material world sets boundaries, it is mathematicians just "spoke" things wrong.
It is really a huge problem in modern science, when math excersises was set higher than real experimentation and studies. (happened around 1970, when the stream of amasing inventions and discoveries suddenly completely dried out) This is completely wrong and evil approach, and it is strange for me that you projecting the same thing in your statement.
Men makes technology. Not vice versa.