That Jewish shit have nothing to do with feminism. Feminism means equal rights and obligations for men and women.
What kikes mean under "feminism" have nothing to do with equal rights at all. It is all about oppressing and subduing men, making total parasites from women and destroying family.
USSR had full-scale feminism, much earlier than any other country, and it does not cause any problems. Russia is more feministic than any other country, with total equality and deserved respect to a women role in society from huge state family payments for bringing child to at least half-year postnatal paid leave for women. Nothing of that damaged family and men/women social roles.
Jews are fucking perverts. They pervert everything they could get their hands on, every sane thing they could find, every wise idea.
What does "equal rights" even mean? This is based on secular humanist ideology which is freemasonic. The French revolution was the first major feminist revolution and guess who was behind that. As a rule of thumb, any revolutionary movement having to do with "freedom, equality, fraternity" and doing away with the old Christian order is run by the jews.
It means state does not make difference between men and women. Women can do anything men can do in relation to the state. That is feminism of the healthy human.
That absolutely doesn't mean that women could be dumb, fat and ugly and demand same attention and attitude from men as pretty, smart and svelte ones. And vice versa. This also does not mean social roles equality. Men can't be pregnant.
Jewish "feminism" began here, when state began to force "equality" into relations between individuals. When individuals are forced to treat equally dumb and smart, ugly and beautiful,
soulless and hearty and so on.
That "rights" thing exist only in relation between individual and state. Not between individuals.
The French revolution was the first major feminist revolution
Many states in the past treated men and women equally long before France.
Fake Jewish "feminism" started, when they hijack that feminism thing in attempt to manipulate society.
I see absolutely nothing bad in men and women having equal rights in relation to the state. And more than century practice show that equal rights of men and women does not destroy family, social relations, religion or whatever other thing. Really it eliminates possibility of missing good opportunities when some individual could not do something useful for society just because state do not allow that based on individual sex.
It means state does not make difference between men and women. Women can do anything men can do in relation to the state. That is feminism of the healthy human.
This assumes men and women aren't different though. The gender roles shift was a result of women getting into government and workforce which happened because of the feminism you think is good.
What if giving women equal rights to men (and even all men equal rights) is not a good thing and opens a pandora box? Because that's exactly what happened. Remember that first wave feminism was precisely about women being equal in state matters. Do you believe for a second it was just going to stay that way and women would be content with their stupid right to vote (which they didn't want to begin with)? Same happened with the gay rights movement and look where we are today. It's a long complex chain of causes and effects. Overtone window going wild.
All feminism in the west was promoted by jews because feminism's cosmology is based on Marxist dialectic - it describes the sexes as being in a constant struggle for power and in a master/slave relation.
This is opposite to what the patriarchal Christian view is on the matter where man and woman were both created in God's image with specific roles with man being the leader and woman being in submission. Once this is lost, all hell breaks lose. The reason it was lost is because men turned away from God, which made them weak and deluded and made women turn against men, screwing the whole hierarchy. Jews helped of course but it was ultimately our weakness and sin that allowed things to come to this.
"Feminism of the healthy human" sounds like "cancer of the healthy human". It's a poisonous ideology and it always was. People are not equal as a whole and should have different roles and places in society. Not everyone is supposed to govern, it's a duty of great responsibility. Equality is another poisonous jewish communist idea brought to fruition by the French revolution. The correct hierarchy is in fact an inverted pyramid, not the masonic one with the monarch being at the bottom carrying the weight of all people.
This assumes men and women aren't different though.
For the state - yes.
The gender roles shift was a result of women getting into government and workforce which happened because of the feminism you think is good.
No. Again, men and women have equal rights in Russia for more than a century. I do not observe any noticeable gender role shift. Being able to realise some right does not mean you have to. So men and women do their choices, what rights they want to realise, and what they don't want. Men can work as nurse, but only few do that. Women can serve in military, but only few do that. When conscious of people is not poisoned by all that jewish perversions (career, selfishness, ultimate competition with everybody including your own family, anti-merit crap, praising degeneracy and so on,), equal rights for men and women could not do any harm.
Because that's exactly what happened.
In the West - may be. Here - not at all. May be it is just because Stalin quickly eliminated all that trotskist kikes who tried to push their perverted dreams from liquidation of family to forcing single sexless type of clothes (forced as unisex today)?
Equality is another poisonous jewish communist idea brought to fruition by the French revolution
You follow their narrative exactly like they want. Equality is a tool. It is useful in one situation and harmful in another. It should be used with wisdom and thought, and can't be something universal.
Imagine you have son and daughter. If you love them equally, does that mean you obliged to dress them in same clothes and buy them same toys? Is equal love to both of your children somehow bad?
Jews do simple thing. They replace meaning and usage of "equality" with their insane meaning and usage. In Russian we have two different words - "равенство" and "уравниловка". First means "equality" like in mathematical sense, and second means "make everything the same, regardless of any circumstances". Kikes replaced first, initial meaning of "equality" with second one. And you bought it.
There can't be "equality" standalone. There always should be objects that are equal. Numbers, rights, height, wage and so on. When you read or hear "equality" without specifiying equality of what exactly meant here, then you are manipulated.
Simple as that. Just ask a question - "Equality of what exactly they are talking about?"
Same thing they did with many other concepts too. "Freedom", "Democracy", "Profit", "Diversity", "Tyranny" and so on.
Freedom from/of what they are talking about? Democracy of whom? Profit of what kind and for whom? Diversity where? Tyranny of what? Easy-peasy. Just ask questions.
And that "communism" thing. Communism is inevitable. Not in jewish, marxist sense, but more like in Star Trek. If humans will survive that clown world and defeat those bastards, sooner or later that replicators will be created. When human being will have everything he need to live, there will be no any sense in money and all that capitalism stuff. Values will shift to usefulness for others, knowledge, goodness, skills and so on. You know, that's how Johannes' Revelation ends. I hope you don't think that there will be capitalism with all that stocks, profits and money making under the ruling of Jesus and Saints :) Mindblowing, isn't it?
That Jewish shit have nothing to do with feminism. Feminism means equal rights and obligations for men and women.
What kikes mean under "feminism" have nothing to do with equal rights at all. It is all about oppressing and subduing men, making total parasites from women and destroying family.
USSR had full-scale feminism, much earlier than any other country, and it does not cause any problems. Russia is more feministic than any other country, with total equality and deserved respect to a women role in society from huge state family payments for bringing child to at least half-year postnatal paid leave for women. Nothing of that damaged family and men/women social roles.
Jews are fucking perverts. They pervert everything they could get their hands on, every sane thing they could find, every wise idea.
What does "equal rights" even mean? This is based on secular humanist ideology which is freemasonic. The French revolution was the first major feminist revolution and guess who was behind that. As a rule of thumb, any revolutionary movement having to do with "freedom, equality, fraternity" and doing away with the old Christian order is run by the jews.
It means state does not make difference between men and women. Women can do anything men can do in relation to the state. That is feminism of the healthy human.
That absolutely doesn't mean that women could be dumb, fat and ugly and demand same attention and attitude from men as pretty, smart and svelte ones. And vice versa. This also does not mean social roles equality. Men can't be pregnant.
Jewish "feminism" began here, when state began to force "equality" into relations between individuals. When individuals are forced to treat equally dumb and smart, ugly and beautiful, soulless and hearty and so on.
That "rights" thing exist only in relation between individual and state. Not between individuals.
Many states in the past treated men and women equally long before France.
Fake Jewish "feminism" started, when they hijack that feminism thing in attempt to manipulate society.
I see absolutely nothing bad in men and women having equal rights in relation to the state. And more than century practice show that equal rights of men and women does not destroy family, social relations, religion or whatever other thing. Really it eliminates possibility of missing good opportunities when some individual could not do something useful for society just because state do not allow that based on individual sex.
This assumes men and women aren't different though. The gender roles shift was a result of women getting into government and workforce which happened because of the feminism you think is good.
What if giving women equal rights to men (and even all men equal rights) is not a good thing and opens a pandora box? Because that's exactly what happened. Remember that first wave feminism was precisely about women being equal in state matters. Do you believe for a second it was just going to stay that way and women would be content with their stupid right to vote (which they didn't want to begin with)? Same happened with the gay rights movement and look where we are today. It's a long complex chain of causes and effects. Overtone window going wild.
All feminism in the west was promoted by jews because feminism's cosmology is based on Marxist dialectic - it describes the sexes as being in a constant struggle for power and in a master/slave relation.
This is opposite to what the patriarchal Christian view is on the matter where man and woman were both created in God's image with specific roles with man being the leader and woman being in submission. Once this is lost, all hell breaks lose. The reason it was lost is because men turned away from God, which made them weak and deluded and made women turn against men, screwing the whole hierarchy. Jews helped of course but it was ultimately our weakness and sin that allowed things to come to this.
"Feminism of the healthy human" sounds like "cancer of the healthy human". It's a poisonous ideology and it always was. People are not equal as a whole and should have different roles and places in society. Not everyone is supposed to govern, it's a duty of great responsibility. Equality is another poisonous jewish communist idea brought to fruition by the French revolution. The correct hierarchy is in fact an inverted pyramid, not the masonic one with the monarch being at the bottom carrying the weight of all people.
For the state - yes.
No. Again, men and women have equal rights in Russia for more than a century. I do not observe any noticeable gender role shift. Being able to realise some right does not mean you have to. So men and women do their choices, what rights they want to realise, and what they don't want. Men can work as nurse, but only few do that. Women can serve in military, but only few do that. When conscious of people is not poisoned by all that jewish perversions (career, selfishness, ultimate competition with everybody including your own family, anti-merit crap, praising degeneracy and so on,), equal rights for men and women could not do any harm.
In the West - may be. Here - not at all. May be it is just because Stalin quickly eliminated all that trotskist kikes who tried to push their perverted dreams from liquidation of family to forcing single sexless type of clothes (forced as unisex today)?
You follow their narrative exactly like they want. Equality is a tool. It is useful in one situation and harmful in another. It should be used with wisdom and thought, and can't be something universal.
Imagine you have son and daughter. If you love them equally, does that mean you obliged to dress them in same clothes and buy them same toys? Is equal love to both of your children somehow bad?
Jews do simple thing. They replace meaning and usage of "equality" with their insane meaning and usage. In Russian we have two different words - "равенство" and "уравниловка". First means "equality" like in mathematical sense, and second means "make everything the same, regardless of any circumstances". Kikes replaced first, initial meaning of "equality" with second one. And you bought it.
There can't be "equality" standalone. There always should be objects that are equal. Numbers, rights, height, wage and so on. When you read or hear "equality" without specifiying equality of what exactly meant here, then you are manipulated.
Simple as that. Just ask a question - "Equality of what exactly they are talking about?"
Same thing they did with many other concepts too. "Freedom", "Democracy", "Profit", "Diversity", "Tyranny" and so on.
Freedom from/of what they are talking about? Democracy of whom? Profit of what kind and for whom? Diversity where? Tyranny of what? Easy-peasy. Just ask questions.
And that "communism" thing. Communism is inevitable. Not in jewish, marxist sense, but more like in Star Trek. If humans will survive that clown world and defeat those bastards, sooner or later that replicators will be created. When human being will have everything he need to live, there will be no any sense in money and all that capitalism stuff. Values will shift to usefulness for others, knowledge, goodness, skills and so on. You know, that's how Johannes' Revelation ends. I hope you don't think that there will be capitalism with all that stocks, profits and money making under the ruling of Jesus and Saints :) Mindblowing, isn't it?