It seems to me that you are saying that Google and Facebook are deliberately promoting Donald Trump to us in the form of the Streisand effect, which is increasing the public awareness of something as a result of attempts to suppress it. My point is that a handful of users in this forum engage in daily anti-Trump political campainging which keeps his name constantly at the top, and if it's logical that Google and Facebook are acting deliberately to promote him, then the same holds for those users here.
Naw man. You're just trying to Streisand him to into the Oval Office. We know your game.
That's not elaboration, that's plain and baseless accusation.
Can you check the title of the post and reconsider your words?
What i'm getting at is that spinning the the negative coverage and unfair treatment of Donald Trump as a backhanded form of endorsement is illogical.
How is it illogical?
The "spinning the negative coverage and unfair treatment of Donald Trump" will promote Trump!
I don't understand how are we on the same page, and yet we argue that we have the same point??
It seems to me that you are saying that Google and Facebook are deliberately promoting Donald Trump to us in the form of the Streisand effect, which is increasing the public awareness of something as a result of attempts to suppress it. My point is that a handful of users in this forum engage in daily anti-Trump political campainging which keeps his name constantly at the top, and if it's logical that Google and Facebook are acting deliberately to promote him, then the same holds for those users here.