a) Does origin (perceivable) need to be interpreted (suggested)?
b) What if interpret implies INTER (internal; within) PER (forwards) aka being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) within origin? Could one miss that?
I provided context
a) All (perceivable) was provided before one (perception) can contextualize (suggested) towards others under the pretext of "providing".
b) Context aka CON (together; with) TEKS (to weave)...why would one, while being apart from one another, weave things together?
c) How does energy weave together particles? Why is it called PART-icle?
You misinterpreted the context I implied which I provided you with. That's ok, even you are wrong sometimes.
a) Does origin (perceivable) need to be interpreted (suggested)?
b) What if interpret implies INTER (internal; within) PER (forwards) aka being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) within origin? Could one miss that?
a) All (perceivable) was provided before one (perception) can contextualize (suggested) towards others under the pretext of "providing".
b) Context aka CON (together; with) TEKS (to weave)...why would one, while being apart from one another, weave things together?
c) How does energy weave together particles? Why is it called PART-icle?
Can nature be wrong? Can all be wrong? Can energy be wrong? What if wrong implies being ignoring right/reg - "to move in a straight line"? ... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right#etymonline_v_15068