NO it is not. I've corrected you before with actual links to the SoC specs and radio bands.
Stop believing random Android blogs written by retards.
It was planned for Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, but it never materialized (on the hardware level). Supposedly the hardware is there in SOME units of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 that have the compatible antenna. Mediatek has also a few Socs, such at 9300 series and the Mediatek Dimensity 930 series (used in Defy2. and Cat S75) And of course, all of the Pixel series since at least Pixel 7 (tensor G2 with Samsung Modem). It's on a trial stage currently. Most old phones cannot be turned into 3GPP NTN sat phones with a mere software update. They don't have the SoC/Antenna to do it. In the future yes... but not now.
Then there are a few odd Huawei and other chinese models that have their own, Chinese satellite (specific band/comms) compatible sat access.
Most Android phones are NOT (on hardware OR software level) compatible with satellite access.
In USA Goole pixel are 2.4% of Android phone market and less than 1% globally.
An all pervasive global satellite phone spy network that does not make, except for
Yes, eventually, but not yet.
You can still buy 4G only, Snapdragon 8Gen2 (or earlier) and even Chinese phones that lack the required hardware.
Then if you want, you can even buy a Google Pixel and install GrapheneOS on that. Afaik, that does not still currently answer to any Satellite (3GPP NTN) calls nor answer with precise GPS data, as Pixel 9 series does.
However, it is of course obvious that just by connecting to a 3G/4G/LTE network you are constantly triangle located using multiple towers down to a few meter accuracy. There is no way around this, other than turning your phone power off (after which it doesn't actively respond all the time).
Even worse is the fairly recent Android phone passive bluetooth answering mode (hardware+software stack) in modern phones, that works even if you turn OFF your phone (BT chip has it's own power supply and will answer calls even when turned off, in these modern phones). You can circumvent this only by putting your phone in a tight enough faraday bag (and pref, turned off also, just to reduce the power of transmitting radios).
Future is indeed bleak in this regard, but we are NOT yet at even 10% Android Satellite location/spy phone coverage (iPhone users be damned, they are all cucked since iPhone 14 series).
Too tired to dig up source, do your own research. Tired of correcting this.
And ayh probably explained to you that LEO provides enough connectivity for 4/5G to recieve the very miniscule amount of data necessary (mere bits) for eID validation and BTCBDC validation. Most phones in the last 5 years ARE compatible bcz THIS HAS BEEN THE PLAN FOR A DECADE PLUS. They started launching Starlink in 2019/g, prepping years prior. The cellular connectivity was pitched then as well, we were just not listening. ALL phones in the last 5 years have been more than capable.
There are papers that go back to mid 2010's/g discussing the relationship between 5G and LEO which 5G now being well integrated into most modern phones. The band is sustainable enough not only for minor viable coms but especially if hubbed to terrestrial repeaters in more rural areas.
You have to remember that the amount of pinging a GPS does is enough for that CBDC DID approval ping. LEO 5G+ providing even 200 bits is more than enough. Don't over think the spying part. Terrestrial networks already carry that heavy load PLUS the LEO is about sustainability in non-connective areas like rural or on a plane to pay for xyz ..but even then those have connectivity now. Its a gap filler.
NO it is not. I've corrected you before with actual links to the SoC specs and radio bands.
Stop believing random Android blogs written by retards.
It was planned for Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, but it never materialized (on the hardware level). Supposedly the hardware is there in SOME units of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 that have the compatible antenna. Mediatek has also a few Socs, such at 9300 series and the Mediatek Dimensity 930 series (used in Defy2. and Cat S75) And of course, all of the Pixel series since at least Pixel 7 (tensor G2 with Samsung Modem). It's on a trial stage currently. Most old phones cannot be turned into 3GPP NTN sat phones with a mere software update. They don't have the SoC/Antenna to do it. In the future yes... but not now.
Then there are a few odd Huawei and other chinese models that have their own, Chinese satellite (specific band/comms) compatible sat access.
Most Android phones are NOT (on hardware OR software level) compatible with satellite access.
In USA Goole pixel are 2.4% of Android phone market and less than 1% globally.
An all pervasive global satellite phone spy network that does not make, except for
Yes, eventually, but not yet.
You can still buy 4G only, Snapdragon 8Gen2 (or earlier) and even Chinese phones that lack the required hardware.
Then if you want, you can even buy a Google Pixel and install GrapheneOS on that. Afaik, that does not still currently answer to any Satellite (3GPP NTN) calls nor answer with precise GPS data, as Pixel 9 series does.
However, it is of course obvious that just by connecting to a 3G/4G/LTE network you are constantly triangle located using multiple towers down to a few meter accuracy. There is no way around this, other than turning your phone power off (after which it doesn't actively respond all the time).
Even worse is the fairly recent Android phone passive bluetooth answering mode (hardware+software stack) in modern phones, that works even if you turn OFF your phone (BT chip has it's own power supply and will answer calls even when turned off, in these modern phones). You can circumvent this only by putting your phone in a tight enough faraday bag (and pref, turned off also, just to reduce the power of transmitting radios).
Future is indeed bleak in this regard, but we are NOT yet at even 10% Android Satellite location/spy phone coverage (iPhone users be damned, they are all cucked since iPhone 14 series).
Too tired to dig up source, do your own research. Tired of correcting this.
And ayh probably explained to you that LEO provides enough connectivity for 4/5G to recieve the very miniscule amount of data necessary (mere bits) for eID validation and BTCBDC validation. Most phones in the last 5 years ARE compatible bcz THIS HAS BEEN THE PLAN FOR A DECADE PLUS. They started launching Starlink in 2019/g, prepping years prior. The cellular connectivity was pitched then as well, we were just not listening. ALL phones in the last 5 years have been more than capable.
Show me the proof. I'd like to know if this is true. All the data on antenna frequency bands and the SoC modems show me otherwise.
If it's true, I gotta downgrade my phone :-D
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9741772
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Study+on+NR+to+support+Non-Terrestrial+Networks
There are papers that go back to mid 2010's/g discussing the relationship between 5G and LEO which 5G now being well integrated into most modern phones. The band is sustainable enough not only for minor viable coms but especially if hubbed to terrestrial repeaters in more rural areas.
You have to remember that the amount of pinging a GPS does is enough for that CBDC DID approval ping. LEO 5G+ providing even 200 bits is more than enough. Don't over think the spying part. Terrestrial networks already carry that heavy load PLUS the LEO is about sustainability in non-connective areas like rural or on a plane to pay for xyz ..but even then those have connectivity now. Its a gap filler.
Thanks. I did look at those.
But they provide nothing about baseband modems and antennas at specific frequency bands.