There are papers that go back to mid 2010's/g discussing the relationship between 5G and LEO which 5G now being well integrated into most modern phones. The band is sustainable enough not only for minor viable coms but especially if hubbed to terrestrial repeaters in more rural areas.
You have to remember that the amount of pinging a GPS does is enough for that CBDC DID approval ping. LEO 5G+ providing even 200 bits is more than enough. Don't over think the spying part. Terrestrial networks already carry that heavy load PLUS the LEO is about sustainability in non-connective areas like rural or on a plane to pay for xyz ..but even then those have connectivity now. Its a gap filler.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9741772
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Study+on+NR+to+support+Non-Terrestrial+Networks
There are papers that go back to mid 2010's/g discussing the relationship between 5G and LEO which 5G now being well integrated into most modern phones. The band is sustainable enough not only for minor viable coms but especially if hubbed to terrestrial repeaters in more rural areas.
You have to remember that the amount of pinging a GPS does is enough for that CBDC DID approval ping. LEO 5G+ providing even 200 bits is more than enough. Don't over think the spying part. Terrestrial networks already carry that heavy load PLUS the LEO is about sustainability in non-connective areas like rural or on a plane to pay for xyz ..but even then those have connectivity now. Its a gap filler.
Thanks. I did look at those.
But they provide nothing about baseband modems and antennas at specific frequency bands.