Uncool technobots manipulating cells
(cdn.videy.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Laser-powered soft microbots for cell manipulation by the Szeged Institute of Biophysics.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38814436/
Neat. What is the conspiracy? Is there any footage of nanobots, or is that still sci-fi?
The conspiracy is using technology to manipulate biology, I think it's uncool and a crime against God.
I do not think God cares about us manipulating biology. It is when we do stuff like cross bread two different species, that God considers it us perverting nature, which is a sin. Anyway, that is my thought on the matter, if you have Scripture that shows other wise, I will reconsider.
Also someone told me about this: "You saw the iron mixed with clay—the peoples will mix with one another but will not hold together, just as iron does not mix with fired clay." Daniel 2:43 maybe it's relevant. Whole chapter and dream interpretation
Any perversion is perversion and I think it's probably upsetting to Him.
Yeah, cross breading is terrible on tendies.
Care implies "burden of mind"...God implies caretaker aka taking whatever burden those within choose to hold onto.
In other words...caring implies wanting to hold onto; care-taking implies needing to let go. If one cares; then one carries burdens of another within self, while ignoring that nature implies nurture; nourish aka the loss (inception towards death) which promotes growth (life).
There can be only one. First commandment..."you shall have no other gods before me".
Differentiation implies from whole (oneness) into partials (ones)...two implies counting together that which the one and only "god" set apart from one another.
Latin pervertere implies "to overturn". Partials cannot overturn whole, but they can trick each other to turn against one another within conflicts of reason aka "circular" logic.
Nature implies implication (balance); perversion implies reason (imbalance).
Nature directs (inception towards death); those within react (life). Choosing to ignore direction by reacting against one another implies ones voluntary departure aka sin.
Sin/syn - "together; with" contradicts being "apart from one another"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/syn-#etymonline_v_24489
Ones consent to a suggested script contradicts SCRIPT/SKRIBH - "to separate" because consent joins together with suggested, hence con-sider (siding together).
If bio (life) uses tekhnē (artifice); then it manipulates itself against one another within conflicts of reason (logy).
a) Partials within whole can only be against one another...never against whole.
b) Crime/crimen/krei - "to distinguish" implies natural law setting itself apart into each crime within.
Found the guy who has never heard of the transhumanist agenda.
Then I am sure you do not mind explaining what single cell manipulation by microrobotic has to do with the transhumanist agenda.
You, entertainingly, think the manipulation will stop at single cells?
When people are connected en masse to the internet via brain implants this type of nanotechnology will have been greatly expanded and be used to manipulate individuals.
I'd elaborate further but you're too busy "playing dumb" for me to gaf.