This is another act in the psychodrama, as phony as the original "event". The dumb plotline makes no sense.
A court would never force you to sell your assets, they would be seized. If you were forced to sell, you could just sell to a friend for $1 and buy back after bankruptcy for $1. For that matter, you could sell to a different enemy for $1 with no expectation of buyback just to give a middle finger to the court and the plaintiffs.
If anyone is thinking, "Yeah, well, the court could just force you to sell for a reasonable market price," think again. You could do that with a 99.99% commission to your friend, the broker. "Well then the court could....", ad infinitum.
That's why plaintiffs file a judgment lien and then courts seize assets for auction.
This is another act in the psychodrama, as phony as the original "event". The dumb plotline makes no sense.
A court would never force you to sell your assets, they would be seized. If you were forced to sell, you could just sell to a friend for $1 and buy back after bankruptcy for $1. For that matter, you could sell to a different enemy for $1 with no expectation of buyback just to give a middle finger to the court and the plaintiffs.
If anyone is thinking, "Yeah, well, the court could just force you to sell for a reasonable market price," think again. You could do that with a 99.99% commission to your friend, the broker. "Well then the court could....", ad infinitum.
That's why plaintiffs file a judgment lien and then courts seize assets for auction.