Not being a US citizen by birth or naturalization makes a big difference, as you don't have automatic access to the sovereignty rights under the law for those who continue the population that created the governments by their sovereign citizenships.
Citizens have the right to pursue happiness (to work for pay) without interference. Noncitizens have their entry and stay regulated by the government already, so there is an immediate nexus to all money transferred that doesn't apply to the citizen. I haven't been asked recently to look into the laws for noncitizens to review arguments that noncitizens do not earn income, so I apologize for not having any quick takes for you there.
You are right that there should be step-by-step instructions, but since the ones who write (mammoth) step-by-step instructions are the IRS itself, which benefits from obfuscation, and the sovereign citizens are not similarly incentivized to publish but are in fact incentivized to be cautious in speech, the documentation you seek is hard to come by. There exist books that come close, but I'm not prepared to recommend one that applies to your case, and of course there are many more books that mislead or that are controlled oppo. But if you're interested in learning more about the tax fraud in this country, ask away. There would not be any fast or guaranteed path now because it would become commonplace if confirmed by courts; but recent years have allowed other surprising fast or near-guaranteed paths to materialize on other important fronts of sovereign expression, so there's always hope. Rather, we sovereign citizens have the responsibility to blaze our own pioneer paths, and those who succeed will be followed, even by noncitizens who take the additional steps of naturalization so as to share equally and responsibly in our sovereign status. Patient sovereigns decide justice ultimately.
Not being a US citizen by birth or naturalization makes a big difference
I meant I have Russian citizenship, not US one. :) I just trying that concepts on my reality. Things are pretty same really, just with some local specific.
F.e. there was no any procedure of dismissing USSR citizenship for citizens. Formally, I'm a dual citizen of USSR and Russian Federation. So, theoretically I could just use my USSR citizenship to get out RF one. And since USSR is formally exist in form of Transnistria (the only region that never declared exit or whatever from USSR, so become an only and single USSR member and formally represent USSR today), my USSR citizenship is still valid and should be formally accepted by all other states. And since RF declared itself a successor on USSR obligations, includng before USSR citizens, this effectively force it to admit my USSR citizenship and rights. So I don't even need to somehow declare myself sovereign or whatever to do same juridical mumbo-jumbo. :)
sovereign citizens are not similarly incentivized to publish but are in fact incentivized to be cautious in speech, the documentation you seek is hard to come by
I think there is a reason for that. Person who dug so deep in jurisprudence have to understand, that if everybody began use their concepts, then authorities inevitably will change the laws to close all that holes. So it is in his interest to not share that information. :)
The issue about widespread knowledge leading to changed laws is better appreciated in the money issue. When people realize federal reserve notes are fiat there is a very hard landing to return to some kind of gold standard. The means of resolving such a landing are negotiated by power brokers who then propose a transition they can all accept, each for self-interest reasons for different spheres of power. We see this negotiation happening, with many dirty tricks included, in the news daily. It's my belief the tax issue will be resolved similarly as part of the money issue. Either the voluntary tax will remain and knowledge will become wider spread about evitability, or something else will be proposed and possibly mandated, in which case sovereigns will individually need to determine whether to accept it or whether to practice peaceful civil disobedience. But evidence currently favors the first option.
Sadly, most who claim to have the silver bullet, and then publish it step-by-step and make more money selling a system than otherwise, get prosecuted and debunked because they didn't have it. I said there were exceptions. If you have what appears to be the whole truth because all mysteries about the law are explained without equivocation, it is definitely in your interest to share because your conscience is clear. The Swamp Rangers have not currently found it to be in our interests to share details of these laws as an org because the org's goals are different; but as an individual my conscience directs me to answer most specifics when I can give credible, competent info that doesn't interfere with the org. IRL I am much more free about it.
Not being a US citizen by birth or naturalization makes a big difference, as you don't have automatic access to the sovereignty rights under the law for those who continue the population that created the governments by their sovereign citizenships.
Citizens have the right to pursue happiness (to work for pay) without interference. Noncitizens have their entry and stay regulated by the government already, so there is an immediate nexus to all money transferred that doesn't apply to the citizen. I haven't been asked recently to look into the laws for noncitizens to review arguments that noncitizens do not earn income, so I apologize for not having any quick takes for you there.
You are right that there should be step-by-step instructions, but since the ones who write (mammoth) step-by-step instructions are the IRS itself, which benefits from obfuscation, and the sovereign citizens are not similarly incentivized to publish but are in fact incentivized to be cautious in speech, the documentation you seek is hard to come by. There exist books that come close, but I'm not prepared to recommend one that applies to your case, and of course there are many more books that mislead or that are controlled oppo. But if you're interested in learning more about the tax fraud in this country, ask away. There would not be any fast or guaranteed path now because it would become commonplace if confirmed by courts; but recent years have allowed other surprising fast or near-guaranteed paths to materialize on other important fronts of sovereign expression, so there's always hope. Rather, we sovereign citizens have the responsibility to blaze our own pioneer paths, and those who succeed will be followed, even by noncitizens who take the additional steps of naturalization so as to share equally and responsibly in our sovereign status. Patient sovereigns decide justice ultimately.
I meant I have Russian citizenship, not US one. :) I just trying that concepts on my reality. Things are pretty same really, just with some local specific.
F.e. there was no any procedure of dismissing USSR citizenship for citizens. Formally, I'm a dual citizen of USSR and Russian Federation. So, theoretically I could just use my USSR citizenship to get out RF one. And since USSR is formally exist in form of Transnistria (the only region that never declared exit or whatever from USSR, so become an only and single USSR member and formally represent USSR today), my USSR citizenship is still valid and should be formally accepted by all other states. And since RF declared itself a successor on USSR obligations, includng before USSR citizens, this effectively force it to admit my USSR citizenship and rights. So I don't even need to somehow declare myself sovereign or whatever to do same juridical mumbo-jumbo. :)
I think there is a reason for that. Person who dug so deep in jurisprudence have to understand, that if everybody began use their concepts, then authorities inevitably will change the laws to close all that holes. So it is in his interest to not share that information. :)
Thank you so much for the Transnistria data!
The issue about widespread knowledge leading to changed laws is better appreciated in the money issue. When people realize federal reserve notes are fiat there is a very hard landing to return to some kind of gold standard. The means of resolving such a landing are negotiated by power brokers who then propose a transition they can all accept, each for self-interest reasons for different spheres of power. We see this negotiation happening, with many dirty tricks included, in the news daily. It's my belief the tax issue will be resolved similarly as part of the money issue. Either the voluntary tax will remain and knowledge will become wider spread about evitability, or something else will be proposed and possibly mandated, in which case sovereigns will individually need to determine whether to accept it or whether to practice peaceful civil disobedience. But evidence currently favors the first option.
Sadly, most who claim to have the silver bullet, and then publish it step-by-step and make more money selling a system than otherwise, get prosecuted and debunked because they didn't have it. I said there were exceptions. If you have what appears to be the whole truth because all mysteries about the law are explained without equivocation, it is definitely in your interest to share because your conscience is clear. The Swamp Rangers have not currently found it to be in our interests to share details of these laws as an org because the org's goals are different; but as an individual my conscience directs me to answer most specifics when I can give credible, competent info that doesn't interfere with the org. IRL I am much more free about it.