We are an object consisting of one part free agent and one part deterministic processor. The free agent can choose inputs for the deterministic system. We don't know the exact deterministic output of these inputs (even though they probably exist explicitly in theory), but we have a rough idea.
What constitutes an input? What percentage of inputs into our deterministic system are involuntary? How many of these involuntary inputs are nefarious? How many of these involuntary inputs are benevolent? How can you increase the number of voluntary inputs your conscious agent is given? Is our conscious agent "given" the gift of voluntary inputs, or does our conscious agent "create" these voluntary inputs from within itself? What are the most impactful kinds of inputs?
It is prudent to take dominion over as many inputs entering your deterministic system as possible, with a goal to minimize nefarious inputs and maximize benevolent inputs.
Yes the post seems silly and abstract, but appears to be fairly logical and straightforward.
a) Logic (conflict of reason) tempts one to ignore psyche (animating power).
b) Reminder implies responding to memory aka to information held within self, while ignoring perceivable inspiration moving through...which cannot be held onto.
c) Being implies product (life) in-between import (inception) and export (death).
a) Others suggest pluralism (we) to tempt each singular partial (one) within whole (oneness) to ignore self for others.
b) Object (inception towards death) generates subjects (life).
c) Consist (standing together) tempts ONE to ignore exist (standing apart from one another).
d) Agency/action (balance) generates regency/reaction (choice).
e) Free (life) implies within dominance (inception towards death) aka free-dom.
f) Suggested determinism (fixed boundaries) tempts one to ignore being solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death), hence free (choice) within a moving boundary (balance).
Ones consent to any suggested -ism affixed it within ones mind/memory.
a) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"
b) Ones perception was generated within (input) all perceivable, while drawing out (output) of it.
c) Few suggest nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt many to de-nial perceivable for suggested...doing nothing (don't) inverts being (perception) done within everything (perceivable).
a) Oneness (whole) generates ones (partials)...so it can only be each one.
b) Nefarious aka NE (nothing) FARI (to speak)...nature doesn't speak, those within speak (suggested words) to distract from nature (perceivable sound).
Only within perceivable sound can one shape suggestible words...doing so implies spell-craft.
a) Voluntary/volent - "will"...within will (involuntary) + being will (benevolent).
b) FREE implies within dominance; WILL (want) implies within need; OF implies out of, hence within and in response to, CHOICE implies within balance.
a) Agent gives (inception) and takes (death) regents (life)...others suggest creationism (out of nothing) to tempt one to ignore discerning self as regent within agent (within everything).
One reacts as input (living) to being put out (dying)...others distract one from that with suggested input tempting consenting output.
b) Creationism (out of nothing) inverts transmutation aka ingredients (life) within base (inception towards death).
Motion (male) to momentum (female) to matter (trans-form)...being implies matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
Suggested IM (within) PACT (to fasten) tempts one to ignore that input (inception of life) implies resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death).