The point retard, was it doesn't have to be "a self replicating virus" in the blood to pose danger because there are other toxic or poisonous compounds that cause pathology without replicating.
How do you know what's in the blood? We're once again at square one - you can't demonstrate there is a virus because you can't properly isolate it. It's either cultured or diagnosed via PCR. What if you can't detect the actual pathogen in the blood? I'm not taking blood from any person who's sick regardless of what's causing the disease. I'd go with the old wisdom, call it "bad blood" and pass.
I don't expect anything. I wouldn't inject blood of someone who's sick with the flu either. But I don't pretend to know exactly what's causing those diseases.
If it were caused by a transmissible virus via blood or close contact with a patient they would have managed to get at least one person sick out of the hundreds who took part in the experiments.
Your entire position boils down to an argument from personal incredulity, because you can't possibly imagine how an experiment 100 years ago could have failed. And if you can't imagine how it could fail, that means viruses aren't real.
Yet you yourself are not volunteering to replicate the experiment with modern flu or covid patients, despite the fact that would be trivial and easy.
And no doubt you are ignoring a massive wealth of data and experiments from the last 100 years that would discredit your position, but they all don't count for some reason probably because they are part of a jew conspiracy to make you think viruses are real, to keep your country in debt or something.
Your entire position boils down to an argument from personal incredulity, because you can't possibly imagine how an experiment 100 years ago could have failed. And if you can't imagine how it could fail, that means viruses aren't real.
It's not just one experiment. There never was a successful one, just like they never successfully isolated a virus. I don't have a good reason to believe in it when the evidence is lacking.
The point retard, was it doesn't have to be "a self replicating virus" in the blood to pose danger because there are other toxic or poisonous compounds that cause pathology without replicating.
How do you know what's in the blood? We're once again at square one - you can't demonstrate there is a virus because you can't properly isolate it. It's either cultured or diagnosed via PCR. What if you can't detect the actual pathogen in the blood? I'm not taking blood from any person who's sick regardless of what's causing the disease. I'd go with the old wisdom, call it "bad blood" and pass.
Strange that you don't expect Spanish flu patients to transmit a contagious poison that will give you Spanish flu.
But yet you do expect to an HIV patient to transmit a contagious poison that will give you HIV.... But definitely not a virus...
Just a contagious poison moving from one person's body to another causing a specific disease.... 🤣
I don't expect anything. I wouldn't inject blood of someone who's sick with the flu either. But I don't pretend to know exactly what's causing those diseases.
If it were caused by a transmissible virus via blood or close contact with a patient they would have managed to get at least one person sick out of the hundreds who took part in the experiments.
Your entire position boils down to an argument from personal incredulity, because you can't possibly imagine how an experiment 100 years ago could have failed. And if you can't imagine how it could fail, that means viruses aren't real.
Yet you yourself are not volunteering to replicate the experiment with modern flu or covid patients, despite the fact that would be trivial and easy.
And no doubt you are ignoring a massive wealth of data and experiments from the last 100 years that would discredit your position, but they all don't count for some reason probably because they are part of a jew conspiracy to make you think viruses are real, to keep your country in debt or something.
It's not just one experiment. There never was a successful one, just like they never successfully isolated a virus. I don't have a good reason to believe in it when the evidence is lacking.