It's a problem inherent to conspiracy theories... There are lots of dumb people out there pulling dumb theories out of their asses.
Dumb people oversimplify complex situations and that oversimplification causes them think some boogey man is pulling the strings behind everything, for some nefarious purpose that can never be really defined. That's why 90%+ of shit on this board is total vapid nonsense.
Including your claims that viruses aren't real, which you won't back up, except for trying to link me to a 3 hour video that's exactly as I described, or giving me a 15 hour reading assignment.
Oh, I see. I'll concede as soon as you give me a good reason why the scientists couldn't make a single person sick with the flu back in 1919. Seems like the Spanish flu was a rebel and didn't want to cooperate with the lab coats - it was hyper infectious though, just not when people were observing it closely.
You can check their methodology in their study, but you don't want to look at it for some reason.
Explain why you can't replicate the experiment with HIV blood.
Because it's contaminated. I'd never take blood from a person suffering from a disease like that. How does that prove the disease is caused by a virus?
It's a problem inherent to conspiracy theories... There are lots of dumb people out there pulling dumb theories out of their asses.
Dumb people oversimplify complex situations and that oversimplification causes them think some boogey man is pulling the strings behind everything, for some nefarious purpose that can never be really defined. That's why 90%+ of shit on this board is total vapid nonsense.
Including your claims that viruses aren't real, which you won't back up, except for trying to link me to a 3 hour video that's exactly as I described, or giving me a 15 hour reading assignment.
Oh, I see. I'll concede as soon as you give me a good reason why the scientists couldn't make a single person sick with the flu back in 1919. Seems like the Spanish flu was a rebel and didn't want to cooperate with the lab coats - it was hyper infectious though, just not when people were observing it closely.
Maybe their methodology was bad... Explain why you can't replicate the experiment with HIV blood.
You can check their methodology in their study, but you don't want to look at it for some reason.
Because it's contaminated. I'd never take blood from a person suffering from a disease like that. How does that prove the disease is caused by a virus?
It's not my job to investigate and rehash some old experiment form over a hundred years ago. Either someone else has replicated it, or they haven't.
Contaminated with what? There's no virus in their blood. Nothing in their blood that's going to self replicate and take over your body, right?
You fucking nailed it dude.