Artificial (suggested) tempts one to ignore to REspond to ALL (perceivable).
This particular artist
a) Reality sets each part within apart from one another...artifice tempts together.
b) From wikipedia: "There is no generally agreed definition of what constitutes art"...why? Because general/generic/affecting all implies motion, which "agreed upon definitions and constitutions" contradicts.
̀Dᶦ͚͍ͅˢᵗʳᵃ̞̣̹ᶜᵗᶦᵒ̖ͅⁿ.
Artificial (suggested) tempts one to ignore to REspond to ALL (perceivable).
a) Reality sets each part within apart from one another...artifice tempts together.
b) From wikipedia: "There is no generally agreed definition of what constitutes art"...why? Because general/generic/affecting all implies motion, which "agreed upon definitions and constitutions" contradicts.
See if you can spot the satanic imagery in this one: https://www.jonathanyeo.com/taron-egerton-as-elton-john
He literally dressed like that. So did 50% of performers in the 70's. Was Peter Gabriel with Genesis a Satanist conspirator..