Pathetic losers.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Once again, I am not confusing astrology for astronomy anymore. It was a mixup of a single word... Again, this is the page regarding Mayan ASTRONOMY.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_astronomy
There is zero mention even of the word astrology. The fact is Mayan's had a deep understanding of ASTRONOMY. Another fact is that you keep insisting it's astrology when it clearly isn't.
In other words... You're being retarded.
You were the one mixing up astrology and astronomy multiple times. It's not my fault that you don't even know the difference.
Now, show the formulas based on a flat earth model that accurately predict the movement of celestial bodies.
Show them or admit that they don't exist.
Once, and if anything it was a spelling/grammar mistake because the link I cited with the statement was to ASTRONOMY!!! So on an initial read the person could automatically understand what i was trying to say, without strongarming the conversation about astrology not being valid.
How about you show me the formula based on the heliocentric model that explains the movement of a star through space? Instead of demanding everyone cite you a god damn source.
I really don't think the earth could be flat but I can understand how the heliocentric model could be a fabrication. I understand how people working on the ground during the moon landing could have been presented with computer simulated data making it look to everyone who worked on the project that it actually happened.
But I damn sure don't go around the internet demanding people who believe globe-molten core earth that they prove it to me. I'm just skeptical. But to see how much time you spend battling it out with people with such loose, awful, regrettable arguments... I mean god damn dude, you keep bitching about ASTROLOGY and ignoring the fact that it his historical fact that MAYA had it all figured out and then some.
You know what I think? I think this is you being a schizoid, and not wanting to accept the possibility. And forcing yourself to exist in a binary YES or NO either it IS or ISN'T either there is EVIDENCE or there ISN'T. When honestly, you know damn good and well you can't be exactly sure.
So shut the fuck up. I'm going to look around and see if I can find alternative formula's that work out. It was only I passing thought but I'll look around and get back to this god awful thread if I do find it.
Long story short: there is no formula based on a flat earth model that predicts the movement of celestial objects.
As predicted, the Flat Earther just makes lame excuses.
It is true the mayan's thought the earth was flat.
It is true the mayan's were able to predict the movements of celestial objects.
The shape of the planet does not effect the formula's involved with predicting the movements of celestial bodies.