a) Birds don't call each other birds...few tempt many with the suggested word "bird" to ignore vogel; fugel; fowl; flow aka the flow of nature (inception towards death) for each form (life) within.
b) Watching the conduct of others (spy) tempts one to ignore sustenance of self.
c) Conduct aka to lead (ducere) together (con) tempts one to ignore being (life) led (inception towards death) apart from one another.
d) If one adapts to perceivable aka if one resonates with nature; then what does it matter what other ones are watching from the shadows of their own ignorance?
e) "tech is so advanced"...implies suggested artifice (tech) over perceivable nature and suggested progressivism (advanced) over needing to resist being progressed towards death.
Ask yourself...what does technology progresses towards? How would a few control a many without technology? Why are artifice (tech) and reason (logy) connected with each other?
a) Birds don't call each other birds...few tempt many with the suggested word "bird" to ignore vogel; fugel; fowl; flow aka the flow of nature (inception towards death) for each form (life) within.
b) Watching the conduct of others (spy) tempts one to ignore sustenance of self.
c) Conduct aka to lead (ducere) together (con) tempts one to ignore being (life) led (inception towards death) apart from one another.
d) If one adapts to perceivable aka if one resonates with nature; then what does it matter what other ones are watching from the shadows of their own ignorance?
e) "tech is so advanced"...implies suggested artifice (tech) over perceivable nature and suggested progressivism (advanced) over needing to resist being progressed towards death.
Ask yourself...what does technology progresses towards? How would a few control a many without technology? Why are artifice (tech) and reason (logy) connected with each other?