as if no one has freewill except the jew

a) Ones choice selects chosen ones suggestion. For example "no"...which implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) and ones consent to de-nial perceivable for suggested.

b) Except aka ex capio (taking out) implies ones choice to take something suggested out of another, while ignoring to be within perceivable.

Perceivable (inspiration) cannot be taken/possessed/held onto...suggested (information) can be held mentally if one chooses to hold onto it aka taking possession of it, while becoming possessed by it.

it sounds like...became

Became is a suggested word inverting perceivable sound...within one "came to be" different from one another...not alike.

Did the...British...bear no responsibility?

Ones response-ability (free will of choice) is shirked onto another when consenting to suggested pluralism (the British).

And are we really to believe Russians were incapable of creating/drinking alcohol without the help of jews?

a) Creationism (creating) and nationalism (russians) are suggested by few to tempt many to consent/accredit/believe it.

b) One does not need to drink alcohol...one needs perceivable thirst; while others suggest alcohol to tempt ones appetite into conflicts of reason like vodka vs ouzo; beer vs wine; soft liquor vs hard liquor; high percentage vs low percentage; alcoholic vs non-alcoholic; drunk vs sober; indulging vs abstaining; expensive vs cheap; fruity vs earthy; red vs white; martini vs margarita; bloody mary vs cosmopolitan etc.

c) It's the industrialization of temptation by few for many, which "willingly" exterminates many in favor of few.

d) If consent meets suggestion; then it shapes suicide (buying into) meeting genocide (selling out). FREE will of choice cannot be bought or sold without ones free will of choice to ignore/deny self...a jew chooses to be the merchant for that deal with gentile self denial.

would they just drink less if jews weren't involved in alcohol production?

Consider "don't get high on your own supply"...if one produces and consumes alcohol, then ones production and consumption will suffer shortly after. Entrance the happy merchant of temptation supplying production towards consumption for a price. This way...the production exponentially increases, while each consumer exponentially drowns in loss, while paying not just for the product, but with his life (and the life of others) for the consumption.

Underneath all of that operates need (thirst) and want (appetite)...which can be tempted into a conflict of reason (want vs not want). A jew sells both sides within every conflict of reason to each consenting gentile; who willingly ignores perceivable need.

I have no reason to believe...

Belief (consent to suggested) generates reason (conflict over suggested)....like for example believing "no" generating "yes vs no" reasoning.

Consider making a statement about self (i have no) build upon a conflict with others (yes vs no reasoning). Guess who makes bank by selling you "nothing"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI