I know you hate it when I break your idols.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Are you aware that all such trivial and easy experiments during the Spanish flu and later during the polio epidemic failed? They had symptomatic patients in close contact and sneezing multiple times in healthy subjects' faces (who weren't exposed to the disease prior to that) and couldn't get a single person sick. They tried injecting them with mucous and even that failed. Those experiments proved said diseases are not contagious, meaning the contagious pathogen hypothesis goes down the drain. So what now?
From 1933 to present day, virologists have been unable to present any experimental study proving that influenza spreads through normal contact between people. All attempts were met with failure.
I just told you they failed with the flu - what makes you think they will not fail with those others viruses? I personally can attest to not getting the flu or covid while being in close contact with people who were sick without having prior infection myself. That's anecdotal and I'm not serving it as proof.
Dude, they had people sneezing in the face of the subject and injecting mucous in their veins. How much more definite can one get?
Stop strawmaning - we're talking direct contact between infected and healthy individuals, where droplets, supposedly carrying billions of virions coming into contact with the mucous membrane of the subject failed to produce the disease.
Not culturing, not in vitro experiments but good ol' fashioned sneezing, then injecting mucous and then inoculating mucous on the eyes of the subjects. Nothing happened. Not a single fucking case. Explain that.
Sauce: https://www.scribd.com/document/465804177/EXPERIMENTS-TO-DETERMINE-MODE-OF-SPREAD-OF-INFLUENZA-ExposeBillGates-COVID1984-PLANdemic
Present the studies with the experiments proving viral contagion or stfu.
You're begging the question. How does witnessing lots of people in close proximity getting sick inform you it's a microscopic contagious pathogen causing the disease and not other environmental factors? Isn't that why experiments to determine mode of transmission are conducted? And yet they couldn't successfully transmit the disease even when using over-the-top methods. Meanwhile we're supposed to believe these viruses are so contagious that we need masks and social distancing to not get infected.
Cope. I'm not surprised at all. You didn't even engage with the proof I presented. You're obviously not good faith and don't care about the truth of the matter but have some sort of an agenda. All you do is ad homs and pearl clutching - much empty talk about "muh science" and no actual scientific evidence presented. At least take the L like a big boy.
Are you by chance retarded or just a common liar? The study told you they couldn't produce the disease by exposing healthy subjects to symptomatic patients , meaning they couldn't prove contagion, to which you replied:
And I logically pointed out this observation tells you nothing of how and why the disease occurs - you're assuming contagiousness but you haven't proven it hence it's begging the thing in question. Are you playing dumb with me running in circles? How are you supposed to do science when you can't do logic?
Lying like a dirty gypsy once more. But why? No one else is reading our little argument. Look back at who brought up Koch in the first place. Then look at what I replied. I've already quoted it a couple comments ago:
Then I did provide a source of my citation about the Spanish flu, you disingenuous little bitch. And you refused to comment on it but instead went on deflecting about Koch's fake and gay assumptions (sure I grant you that) as if my argument hinges on them.
I'm done here.