Your reply isn’t respectful at all. It’s like when people say no offense then proceed to be incredibly offensive. Just because you say it doesn’t make it true.
This isn’t my idea. This idea comes from a best selling author and ceo of an AI company who has written 5 books on AI and the human mind.
You didn’t act in good faith at all and that is why your comment is completely fallacious and lacks any substance. You just say I’m wrong and then present no evidence or reasoning. It makes you seem ignorant. it’s the equivalent of a three year old saying nuh-uh to adults who know far more about the world.
There is no discussion to be had in what you said. That is the clear indicator it was made in bad faith. If you were respectfully disagreeing with me you would have presented a reasonable argument that I could consider.
Instead you said literally nothing of substance, again like a 3 year old shouting nuh-uh you’re dumb and wrong. At least that’s how it looks to those of us who can think.
Respectfully sir, this sounds like a take from a retard. Someone who thinks they're far smarter than they actually are. Again, with all due respect.
Your reply isn’t respectful at all. It’s like when people say no offense then proceed to be incredibly offensive. Just because you say it doesn’t make it true.
This isn’t my idea. This idea comes from a best selling author and ceo of an AI company who has written 5 books on AI and the human mind.
https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/what-if-generative-ai-turned-out?trk=article-ssr-frontend-pulse_little-text-block
You didn’t act in good faith at all and that is why your comment is completely fallacious and lacks any substance. You just say I’m wrong and then present no evidence or reasoning. It makes you seem ignorant. it’s the equivalent of a three year old saying nuh-uh to adults who know far more about the world.
There is no discussion to be had in what you said. That is the clear indicator it was made in bad faith. If you were respectfully disagreeing with me you would have presented a reasonable argument that I could consider.
Instead you said literally nothing of substance, again like a 3 year old shouting nuh-uh you’re dumb and wrong. At least that’s how it looks to those of us who can think.
https://thenextweb.com/news/meta-yann-lecun-ai-behind-human-intelligence What’s this? The godfather of AI.
This is how you slay a shill, facts, evidence, and reasoning. Something your posts lack.
TL;DR